The actual reasons of the higher ups are irrelevant, the lie they were sold on was protecting women. Even now, they talk about how the US pullout will affect women's rights in Afghanistan like people should actually fucking care.
I wonder how many less men would have died if women tried to actually do something under occupation rather than sell out their allies, families and country for their own gain.
I doubt anyone signed up to protect "muh women's rights". But assuming arguendo that they did, if you admit that Realpolitik was the actual motive, then the same number of people would have died anyway.
What this has to do with the vaccine is anyone's guess.
Even now, they talk about how the US pullout will affect women's rights in Afghanistan like people should actually fucking care.
The way Muslims treat women is pretty awful.
if women tried to actually do something under occupation rather than sell out their allies, families and country for their own gain.
Oh yeah, the Titanic. And every other disaster ever. And every armed conflict ever. And every hostage situation ever.
And yes, you're right - the Titanic isn't why women have what they have. Now how about you go to to your kitchen, turn on the light and get a glass of water - and have a think about the gigantic effort that had to go into "haha I flip switch, lightbulb go bzzz and faucet go brrr".
You're welcome, sincerely the generations of men who wrecked their backs building it just so you can be an ungrateful, obnoxious twat and feel euphoric arguing semantics.
Oh yeah, the Titanic. And every other disaster ever. And every armed conflict ever. And every hostage situation ever.
Armed conflicts were hardly fought 'for women to have what they have'...
You're welcome, sincerely the generations of men who wrecked their backs building it just so you can be an ungrateful, obnoxious twat and feel euphoric arguing semantics.
Wait, you think I'm a woman? None of this was your doing, by the way. People did not invent the light-switch or the tap for women. So the claim was nonsense.
I mean yeah, he's a midwit on a good day and doesn't hesitate to sacrifice an entire community (see his actions during the early days of r/kia2), but whenever he and theimpossible1 encounter eachother in a thread it's like something in his brain short-circuits and he defaults to a level of mental gymnastics that would make an r/politics mod proud. Doesn't matter what exactly theimpossible1 says or what the topic of the discussion is, aov goes full Dalek and just HAS to... I don't know, exterminate theimpossible1's very existence I guess?
Like what? What did they sacrifice for women as a class?
Their lives for a start, how many men died for "women's rights" abroad? Actually, how many men died because women wouldn't fight for their country?
Their children's futures, which are now controlled by women and granted based on their gender and loyalty to the cause.
God only knows how much in tax money was burned in tribute to our "superiors".
Zero. They died for Realpolitik.
A negative number, as many more would have died if they also had to take care of women incompetently fighting.
The actual reasons of the higher ups are irrelevant, the lie they were sold on was protecting women. Even now, they talk about how the US pullout will affect women's rights in Afghanistan like people should actually fucking care.
I wonder how many less men would have died if women tried to actually do something under occupation rather than sell out their allies, families and country for their own gain.
I doubt anyone signed up to protect "muh women's rights". But assuming arguendo that they did, if you admit that Realpolitik was the actual motive, then the same number of people would have died anyway.
What this has to do with the vaccine is anyone's guess.
The way Muslims treat women is pretty awful.
What cockamamie theory have you come up with now?
... you do realize the consequence of "women and children first" is "men last", right?
I meant this specifically.
I am pretty sure that the Titanic is not the reason why women 'have what they have'.
Parenthetically, the very classy 'suffragists' downplayed the sacrifice made by these men on the Titanic.
Oh yeah, the Titanic. And every other disaster ever. And every armed conflict ever. And every hostage situation ever.
And yes, you're right - the Titanic isn't why women have what they have. Now how about you go to to your kitchen, turn on the light and get a glass of water - and have a think about the gigantic effort that had to go into "haha I flip switch, lightbulb go bzzz and faucet go brrr".
You're welcome, sincerely the generations of men who wrecked their backs building it just so you can be an ungrateful, obnoxious twat and feel euphoric arguing semantics.
Armed conflicts were hardly fought 'for women to have what they have'...
Wait, you think I'm a woman? None of this was your doing, by the way. People did not invent the light-switch or the tap for women. So the claim was nonsense.
It's funny with aov...
I mean yeah, he's a midwit on a good day and doesn't hesitate to sacrifice an entire community (see his actions during the early days of r/kia2), but whenever he and theimpossible1 encounter eachother in a thread it's like something in his brain short-circuits and he defaults to a level of mental gymnastics that would make an r/politics mod proud. Doesn't matter what exactly theimpossible1 says or what the topic of the discussion is, aov goes full Dalek and just HAS to... I don't know, exterminate theimpossible1's very existence I guess?