If you go through this, IMO you should divide it into three sections
First section is the most visible on the site, and these are the top 10 most public scandals, where even flaming liberals would have to concede they were total lies:
Covington Kids
Jussie Smollett
Michael Avenatti
Chris Cuomo breaking quarantine
Gavin Newsom breaking quarantine
The NASCAR garage door puller
Masks don't work -- now they DO!
Covering up for the WHO dismissing Taiwan / The virus "does not spread person to person"
Kavanaugh (maybe move down)
Russian Collusion (maybe move down)
The second section would be very similar, very public scandals, but ones that liberals might need a bit more evidence to believe:
Covering up Riots ("mostly peaceful protests")
Democrats claiming covid wasn't a big deal / Blocking travel from China is xenophobic
Cuomo Nursing homes
That voter ID's are "racist" and people don't support them -- they overwhelmingly do
FBI involvement in the 2016 election / Spying on Trump campaign (2016)
Saying Trump "trashed dead American soldiers" even when people present said it never happened
Covering up violence against conservatives
Ignoring the skyrocketing crime in places where police were "defunded"
The third section would be everything else, backed up with evidence.
I recommend doing it like this because to redpill someone you need to get your foot in the door first, and get them to admit something that they already secretly know.
If you confront them with some of the more controversial stuff right away, they're pre-programmed to reject it. Instead it's got to be something that they have to admit to unless they deny reality, like the Jussie Smollet case or the Covington Catholic kids.
Start with truths that are easy to admit, and then move to the bigger stuff. "If the media was willing to lie about that, why wouldn't they lie about other things too?"
If you go through this, IMO you should divide it into three sections
First section is the most visible on the site, and these are the top 10 most public scandals, where even flaming liberals would have to concede they were total lies:
The second section would be very similar, very public scandals, but ones that liberals might need a bit more evidence to believe:
The third section would be everything else, backed up with evidence.
I recommend doing it like this because to redpill someone you need to get your foot in the door first, and get them to admit something that they already secretly know.
If you confront them with some of the more controversial stuff right away, they're pre-programmed to reject it. Instead it's got to be something that they have to admit to unless they deny reality, like the Jussie Smollet case or the Covington Catholic kids.
Start with truths that are easy to admit, and then move to the bigger stuff. "If the media was willing to lie about that, why wouldn't they lie about other things too?"