Yup! All women are feminists, even the ones claiming they aren’t, or even those that actively promote “traditionalism”. When it comes down to it, they are always angling for something. For an excellent display of this watch the Fresh and Fit podcast AfterHours show from last night (Monday August 9th).
Every woman on the panel was explicitly asked if they were a feminist, and they all denounced it as if “feminists” were crazy. Then they proceeded to espouse total feminist propaganda and leaning back on exceptions to the rule to support their flimsy and ridiculous arguments.
Even one of the women on the panel EXTRA EXPLICITLY claimed to be for traditional gender roles, super religious, celebate the whole nine yards, but not only was that completely disingenuous as she slowly revealed her lifestyle desires, behaviors, and expectations of men, but even when simply presented with what preferences a man has (men’s preferences being a topic she literally cannot argue a man against as a women, she should simply told what they are and accept it) she ARGUED against them.
It was totally nuts. Surprisingly it was one of their more calm shows, no women getting psychotic and throwing shit. But typical feminist, aka FEMALE, behavior.
Men are simple, and easily manipulated creatures sadly. Men are too idealistic and need to wake the fuck up.
It’s easy to expose them. Just ask them if they will submit to a man. Especially a Christian woman lol. Ask if she will “honor and obey” her husband. Make it part of the vows. They can’t even say it.
A woman’s role is to be submissive towards her man. The problem is 99.9% of women reject it, and so our society suffers… at least until men wake up.
Can we stop using their terms such as partner and "PrEfeRrEd pR0noUns" while talking about how degenerate these pervs are? Call a spade a spade. I wish so called conservatives would stop indulging these hell-bound effeminate scumbags. Calling men women, using she and her to describe someone fuglier (and male-looking) than that one orc commander in Return of the King, makes me wonder if these people aren't just grifters.
Partner can also work as an actual descriptor, not pronoun.
For example if you don't know if some is married or not. Don't avoid using words, because an enemy has subverted it, use it correctly in its original meaning.
This I will disagree with. I know quite a few women who are still good, Christian and genuinely feminine, and I don't associate with or even speak to other women, besides telling them that I do in fact want my receipt.
They're by far the small minority of females, but they do exist.
The second you see it has short hair, you know it's an obvious enemy combatant. If it's colored (I mean the hair, not the body.), you should really gtfo of there.
Brands including convenience store GS 25 and fried chicken chains BBQ Genesis and Kyochon were forced to remove print ads containing the gesture earlier this year, following boycott calls.
GS 25 President Cho Yoon-sung, for example, was demoted over the ad - even though he apologised for causing "pain" and said the firm would investigate those involved in the design of a poster featuring the gesture and a sausage
Victory is possible. We need to absolutely crush Fourth Reich sympathizers and accept absolutely no apologies, just like the winning formula in South Korea.
Notice that they can band together against women because they are one group with one mutual enemy? I wonder why the BLM board is all women. If we're fighting each other, we're not fighting them.
The gesture - involving the thumb and index finger pinched close together - was the logo of Megalia, the now-defunct radical feminist online community widely perceived to be anti-male
BBC as unbiased as ever. Megalia members literally raped and killed men. They were arrested for it.
Can't wait for Ovarit members to start getting investigated, it'll be bigger than Megalia.
Can confirm that feminism is unpopular among the young male demographic here. Here's a fairly decent explanation of this situation that I picked off the Korea subreddit:
Now on Koreans and feminism: it's not really appealing to young Korean males when they're told they're privileged, due to certain societal norms and pressures. That's probably the case for most places but I'm not sure many have the strict railroaded path to adulthood that's present here.
Kid comes out of high school and if he's lucky he's conscripted immediately or face prison. He spends two years divorced from education getting obedience beaten into him and when he gets back, he needs to re-study to the point that he was at high school level, and then apply for college all over again. So when he joins society as an adult, his first job will be 25 years old. If unlucky, he will already be in college and get swiped before finals - he will have to wait for the start of the academic year and retake the same year and be 27 when he starts his first job.
His high school female friend got out of college at 23 and started. By 3 years, she will already be an assistant manager or a section manager or achieve it 2~4 years before him, forever his superior that he must bow to. She will have a higher income than him by default. The only difference between them is their gender/sex.
Now, he is a male. He is expected by society to provide the bulk of the funds required to secure a house and possibly a car. He is considered ineligible, a loser, by the middle-class if he doesn't have a decent lump sum of money so he will forego many expenses. Meanwhile, it is a very acceptable lifestyle for a young woman in her 20's to spend most of her income traveling and spending. She is not and will not be expected to provide.
Even with these inherent handicaps, men are still expected to earn more than women when considering each other for dating or marriage. There are no slurs for women who don't earn much income but there are plenty of words for men who do not, which you will find used predominantly by women than men.
A societal problem that feminism will address, clearly, since feminism in most of the world is about breaking this gender roles and bringing gender equality? Unfortunately not. Feminism here focuses on dismantling the institutions which are genuinely unfair to women but it usually stops there - the equality espoused can therefore be seen by many young Korean males to be a front. Sometimes the institutions set up are genuinely baffling for a western audience - reserved parking spaces for women that are placed near disabled spots, performative leniency provided by the conglomerate companies exclusively to women, etc.
Physical and dirty labor that needs being done in the office? A male newbie does that - telling a female one to do that is frowned upon. Cleaning duties? An old dinosaur might assign a female but no, the modern superior is not sexist therefore to remove all shadow of a doubt, the duties will be assigned to the male. Petty, small things that aren't on par with the existential problems of being expected to be the provider despite handicaps, but still things that get brought up as 'evidence' of 'female preferential treatment' - on the macro and micro scales, young Korean males can have things to point to and focus on exclusively without seeing the other side of the argument.
Of course on a macro and micro scale for women, the genuine problems of sexual crimes, violent crimes, spousal abuse, childbirth being an end to many careers and their own societal pressures exist. These are injustices that need correcting but somehow the political capital gets used on those other petty, small things that I mentioned earlier. And people don't focus on what they have - they focus on what they don't have, so the issues that need addressing aren't at the forefront of young males (they do acknowledge it if you nudge them, but it's not the first thing they seem to think of). Getting these two sides to see eye-to-eye has been so far impossible for the most part, to the point that the middle ground has given up and the only sides that are willing to keep talking, are the screaming extremists from both sides of the divide.
The reforms being pushed for by Korean feminists that get heard on the ground don't always tackle the genuine issues of crimes and societal pressures. The ones quietly pushing for reforms that make meaningful changes don't necessarily get heard. A common refrain that results due to that is that the perception of a "feminist" in Korea is "wants all the privileges without the responsibilities". That phrase alone is a lot to unpack but I've written a lot already and I'm not an expert on any of this.
Korean males can have things to point to and focus on exclusively without seeing the other side of the argument.
Of course on a macro and micro scale for women, the genuine problems of sexual crimes, violent crimes, spousal abuse, childbirth being an end to many careers and their own societal pressures exist.
I hope that fence post feels good up there, you're sitting pretty firmly on it, feminist sympathizer.
I'd like to reiterate that I pulled this explanation off r/korea, and that I felt like it simply has done the best job of explaining how the majority of young males feel over here.
Some men became fixated on the image because they associate it with a particular brand of feminism that they claim demeans and belittles them," said Dr Judy Han, a gender studies professor at the University of California, Los Angeles.
I love how this woman frames criticism of feminism.
"It doesn't demean or belittle men, that's just your claim"
"Even if it does, that's just a particular brand, which I will make excuses for, while claiming it doesn't represent anything larger"
There's no such thing as a former feminist.
There's no such thing as a feminist who believes in equality.
There's no such thing as a feminist that doesn't hate men.
There's no such thing as a good feminist.
I'd go as far as saying there's no such thing as a non-feminist woman.
Yup! All women are feminists, even the ones claiming they aren’t, or even those that actively promote “traditionalism”. When it comes down to it, they are always angling for something. For an excellent display of this watch the Fresh and Fit podcast AfterHours show from last night (Monday August 9th).
Every woman on the panel was explicitly asked if they were a feminist, and they all denounced it as if “feminists” were crazy. Then they proceeded to espouse total feminist propaganda and leaning back on exceptions to the rule to support their flimsy and ridiculous arguments.
Even one of the women on the panel EXTRA EXPLICITLY claimed to be for traditional gender roles, super religious, celebate the whole nine yards, but not only was that completely disingenuous as she slowly revealed her lifestyle desires, behaviors, and expectations of men, but even when simply presented with what preferences a man has (men’s preferences being a topic she literally cannot argue a man against as a women, she should simply told what they are and accept it) she ARGUED against them.
It was totally nuts. Surprisingly it was one of their more calm shows, no women getting psychotic and throwing shit. But typical feminist, aka FEMALE, behavior.
Men are simple, and easily manipulated creatures sadly. Men are too idealistic and need to wake the fuck up.
It’s easy to expose them. Just ask them if they will submit to a man. Especially a Christian woman lol. Ask if she will “honor and obey” her husband. Make it part of the vows. They can’t even say it.
A woman’s role is to be submissive towards her man. The problem is 99.9% of women reject it, and so our society suffers… at least until men wake up.
Isn't she a single mom? Point proven.
Can we stop using their terms such as partner and "PrEfeRrEd pR0noUns" while talking about how degenerate these pervs are? Call a spade a spade. I wish so called conservatives would stop indulging these hell-bound effeminate scumbags. Calling men women, using she and her to describe someone fuglier (and male-looking) than that one orc commander in Return of the King, makes me wonder if these people aren't just grifters.
Partner can also work as an actual descriptor, not pronoun.
For example if you don't know if some is married or not. Don't avoid using words, because an enemy has subverted it, use it correctly in its original meaning.
This I will disagree with. I know quite a few women who are still good, Christian and genuinely feminine, and I don't associate with or even speak to other women, besides telling them that I do in fact want my receipt.
They're by far the small minority of females, but they do exist.
Ask them if they plan to “honor and obey” their future husbands, or if they’re already married, ask them if their husband is their head.
I guarantee you they will say he is “the head of the household”, even though the Bible is very clear that he is the head of HER.
Maybe .1% of women actually want to be women.
The second you see it has short hair, you know it's an obvious enemy combatant. If it's colored (I mean the hair, not the body.), you should really gtfo of there.
Victory is possible. We need to absolutely crush Fourth Reich sympathizers and accept absolutely no apologies, just like the winning formula in South Korea.
Notice that they can band together against women because they are one group with one mutual enemy? I wonder why the BLM board is all women. If we're fighting each other, we're not fighting them.
BBC as unbiased as ever. Megalia members literally raped and killed men. They were arrested for it.
Can't wait for Ovarit members to start getting investigated, it'll be bigger than Megalia.
The reaction will be "Here's how toxic masculinity leads to extreme radical feminism".
Can confirm that feminism is unpopular among the young male demographic here. Here's a fairly decent explanation of this situation that I picked off the Korea subreddit:
I hope that fence post feels good up there, you're sitting pretty firmly on it, feminist sympathizer.
I'd like to reiterate that I pulled this explanation off r/korea, and that I felt like it simply has done the best job of explaining how the majority of young males feel over here.
AKA, these aren't even my own words.
Oh, I know. I was attacking the person who wrote them.
Too busy fence sitting to condemn a literal death cult.
I think the reasoning has far more to do with Megalia and how their members literally killed, molested and raped men and boys.
They know what feminists truly are better than anyone because of that.
kthx for no shooty-shooty the messenger
Koreans dont have "korean guilt" and still value beauty and culture.
Most asian countries have 40 to 100 years before they catch up to western bullshit.
BBC is feminist propaganda.
Any country that pays women to sit at home and not get married or work ends up with bitter feminist women like you find at the BBC.
Luckily Asian countries don’t reward women for living alone so they have to contribute to society.
I love how this woman frames criticism of feminism.
"It doesn't demean or belittle men, that's just your claim"
"Even if it does, that's just a particular brand, which I will make excuses for, while claiming it doesn't represent anything larger"
Her field was literally created by the "reduce the male population to 10%" woman. What a hypocrite.
Although some women can rock short hair, the vast majority of them look better with long hair.
reposted to kia2 on ruqqus: https://ruqqus.com/+kotakuinaction2/post/d89u/south-korean-men-are-using-cancel