Honestly, he obviously didn't get 81 million votes. But he may have gotten 70-75 million.
Here's the thing. I was predicting a bit of a landslide and I admit that I was wrong. I made a terrible miscalculation:
I thought that the riots would hurt the Democrats.
I was dead wrong.
The data, and in places where we can assume cheating was relatively minor, indicates otherwise. Places that experienced serious riots and terrorism didn't go red. They went hard blue. The riots increased Democratic vote.
On top of that, Left-wing 3rd party vote dried up. They rallied under Biden. Greens, Socialists, Bernie Bros, "Left Libertarians", even your regular old Bill Maher style Soft Leftists looked at burning cities, and voted Biden. Unfailingly.
I was so confused. I didn't understand how that could be. We literally watched a Leftist Civil War take place with the radical left pulling what I called: a WWE triple threat match heel turn, where they make an alliance with someone, then smash them over the head with a chair to take power at the last second; ending up with both of them loosing.
But I didn't listen to my own advice about the Social Justice Racket being industrialized emotional abuse; and that Leftism was a philosophy of War.
When I started to think about it from a power perspective, from an abuse perspective, from a warfare perspective; it all made perfect sense.
See, the Anti-Left thinks in principles. We all have different ones, but we think from principles.
The Left has no principles. They are only concerned with power. Even the Useful Idiots see everything from a perspective of power then instituting grand ideas. Not before.
Well, the way all of us responded to the riots was a revulsion to the aggression against our principles, and even a willingness to actually combat such aggression.
But that's NOT how the Left sees things. They saw burning cities, people attacked in the street, their lives turned upside down; and they simply kneeled to the force that appeared to be the strongest. Abuse victims don't fight back, when they are attacked, and I mean are properly attacked, they don't fight back; they fold and succumb to the new order.
The Left saw that a powerful force was striking them in the face, and they acquiesced to whomever appeared dominant. There was no Leftist Civil War. It was a culling. The violence of the Left against the Left unified the Left.
The riots worked.
And I really should have seen it coming. This works all the time. Whenever a Leftist doesn't get what they want from someone on the Left, they attack, bully, and berate until they get what they want. Someone who never gives in, is cast out from the Left and becomes "Right wing". Hell, look at all the fucking simping for authoritarianism, like the fucking Cuomosexuals.
The Left wants the fucking boot. They want a bull to cuck them. They want to feel safe by being owned.
Why did 75 million people vote Joe Biden? Because they voted for the faction who appeared the strongest to them. Joe Biden might not be strong, but the guy with the crowbar who just smashed that window is.
Not sure I agree with there being places "where we can assume cheating was relatively minor" but I too was surprised by how little effect the riots had. I don't think it had the opposite "fear of power" effect that you claim, it's just that many who wanted to fight back didn't see a point in voting where there is always a democrat supermajority anyway, so they didn't bother, perhaps deciding to flee the area instead if they had a business to take care of.
Also you can't have violent riots if the media refuse to report on it. People kind of on the left or Democrat side still believe the news. They listen to Michelle Obama saying it was a "summer of love" without laughing. In Minneapolis, for example, the news was reporting that white Aryan gangs are to blame for the violence. I know someone who bought a gun for the first time to defend their family against white supremacists. These people are hopeless.
It's not fear of power. It's submission to it. It's an abuse mentality. You feel safe when you convince the abuser that you're on their side while they are hitting someone else.
And if the Right was going to come out, they could have easily done so in anonymous voting. This is basically what happened in 2016. Tons of anti-Left people just said "fuck it" and voted Trump; not even sure if it would work.
Also you can't have violent riots if the media refuse to report on it. People kind of on the left or Democrat side still believe the news. They listen to Michelle Obama saying it was a "summer of love" without laughing. In Minneapolis, for example, the news was reporting that white Aryan gangs are to blame for the violence. I know someone who bought a gun for the first time to defend their family against white supremacists. These people are hopeless.
I agree that there's a lot of these people too, but these aren't the people I'm talking about. I'm not talking about the Rhode Island Leftists. I'm talking about the Kenosha Democrats.
The left has values, a moral code, and principles. They are fine with pragmatic solutions that get results even if it violate their principles.
Also you type too much and make too many assertions stated as facts without any real supporting evidence or even a coherent logical argument to back them.
Honestly, he obviously didn't get 81 million votes. But he may have gotten 70-75 million.
Here's the thing. I was predicting a bit of a landslide and I admit that I was wrong. I made a terrible miscalculation:
I thought that the riots would hurt the Democrats.
I was dead wrong.
The data, and in places where we can assume cheating was relatively minor, indicates otherwise. Places that experienced serious riots and terrorism didn't go red. They went hard blue. The riots increased Democratic vote.
On top of that, Left-wing 3rd party vote dried up. They rallied under Biden. Greens, Socialists, Bernie Bros, "Left Libertarians", even your regular old Bill Maher style Soft Leftists looked at burning cities, and voted Biden. Unfailingly.
I was so confused. I didn't understand how that could be. We literally watched a Leftist Civil War take place with the radical left pulling what I called: a WWE triple threat match heel turn, where they make an alliance with someone, then smash them over the head with a chair to take power at the last second; ending up with both of them loosing.
But I didn't listen to my own advice about the Social Justice Racket being industrialized emotional abuse; and that Leftism was a philosophy of War.
When I started to think about it from a power perspective, from an abuse perspective, from a warfare perspective; it all made perfect sense.
See, the Anti-Left thinks in principles. We all have different ones, but we think from principles.
The Left has no principles. They are only concerned with power. Even the Useful Idiots see everything from a perspective of power then instituting grand ideas. Not before.
Well, the way all of us responded to the riots was a revulsion to the aggression against our principles, and even a willingness to actually combat such aggression.
But that's NOT how the Left sees things. They saw burning cities, people attacked in the street, their lives turned upside down; and they simply kneeled to the force that appeared to be the strongest. Abuse victims don't fight back, when they are attacked, and I mean are properly attacked, they don't fight back; they fold and succumb to the new order.
The Left saw that a powerful force was striking them in the face, and they acquiesced to whomever appeared dominant. There was no Leftist Civil War. It was a culling. The violence of the Left against the Left unified the Left.
The riots worked.
And I really should have seen it coming. This works all the time. Whenever a Leftist doesn't get what they want from someone on the Left, they attack, bully, and berate until they get what they want. Someone who never gives in, is cast out from the Left and becomes "Right wing". Hell, look at all the fucking simping for authoritarianism, like the fucking Cuomosexuals.
The Left wants the fucking boot. They want a bull to cuck them. They want to feel safe by being owned.
Why did 75 million people vote Joe Biden? Because they voted for the faction who appeared the strongest to them. Joe Biden might not be strong, but the guy with the crowbar who just smashed that window is.
Honestly, that's just nonsense. I know plenty of Progressives that vote regularly.
Not sure I agree with there being places "where we can assume cheating was relatively minor" but I too was surprised by how little effect the riots had. I don't think it had the opposite "fear of power" effect that you claim, it's just that many who wanted to fight back didn't see a point in voting where there is always a democrat supermajority anyway, so they didn't bother, perhaps deciding to flee the area instead if they had a business to take care of.
Also you can't have violent riots if the media refuse to report on it. People kind of on the left or Democrat side still believe the news. They listen to Michelle Obama saying it was a "summer of love" without laughing. In Minneapolis, for example, the news was reporting that white Aryan gangs are to blame for the violence. I know someone who bought a gun for the first time to defend their family against white supremacists. These people are hopeless.
It's not fear of power. It's submission to it. It's an abuse mentality. You feel safe when you convince the abuser that you're on their side while they are hitting someone else.
And if the Right was going to come out, they could have easily done so in anonymous voting. This is basically what happened in 2016. Tons of anti-Left people just said "fuck it" and voted Trump; not even sure if it would work.
I agree that there's a lot of these people too, but these aren't the people I'm talking about. I'm not talking about the Rhode Island Leftists. I'm talking about the Kenosha Democrats.
The left has values, a moral code, and principles. They are fine with pragmatic solutions that get results even if it violate their principles.
Also you type too much and make too many assertions stated as facts without any real supporting evidence or even a coherent logical argument to back them.
Does it?
Hence they have no principles, values or moral code, i am glad you agree.
Thanks for that. I thought I would have had to write something, but you got this one covered.
Honestly, pinko, lolfail9001 basically did all my work for me.
If you can't live by your principles until you've achieved ultimate power... you don't have principles. That's not how principles work.
They cheated their asses off. Any other explanation is willfully retarded at this point.