Hmmm, why does this sound familiar
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Islam is right about women.
The draft is kind of shit. When push comes to shove, the military isn't going to take women for combat roles, even if they're legally able to. If the situation is actually demanding, they're going to make pragmatic decisions.
I honestly think owning land being a precursor to voting is probably the best metric. It's not perfect but it's something.
It’s almost as if the Founding Fathers knew what they were doing.
Yep, they wouldn't even want us to have a standing army, not like today. On the other hand, everyone was potentially the militia.
Yeah the draft thing that happened or is going to happen is a bit silly. Oh sure they may be "drafted" but how many are truly going to be drafted to front line infantry or something dangerous if we really did have to have another draft? Prob none.
Why would a regime draft patriotic people to mismanaged wars and meatgrinder frontlines to die.
Surely it's going to be a just war and the depopulation of certain parts of the country are a coincidence.
Why would they draft patriotic right-leaning women into pointless meatgrinder wars run by retards to die.
What could possibly be the reason.
This is likely the case with Sparta as well. Of course it had a very masculine culture, it had a legal system where women ended up getting most of the money. Eventually Sparta just declined into a very minor city and everybody else kind of just ignored it, there wasn't any explicit collapse I think but it was taken over by other powers.
Of course a system that allows women to hold positions of high power also means that other subversive actors would have been able to enter and exploit things as well. If the men of a society think that women doing a man's job is alright, they also would not object to an immoral outsider working in positions of power too. Since the end result would be similar either way.
The Rat Utopia experiment showed us what happens to social animals when placed in an environment with boundless resources.
The history books show us that the same thing happens in humans.
The Rat Utopia removed the dominant rats' ability to control resources. This removed the motivation for rats lower in the heirarchy to attempt to compete, which in turn contributed to a regression-to-the-mean in the dominant rats and their offspring. Over time, every rat becomes an unfuckable loser-rat, and the rats stop breeding.
When women are put into positions of leadership, it's just to distract people from the impending decline. It means that the organization/community has no new ideas, has no clue how to deal with their problems, and no drive to go about changing anything even if they did know what needs to be done. Companies that have already peaked usually appoint a female CEO. Countries that have peaked elect a female president. Churches with declining membership accept female bishops and pastors. Women can help comfort people while the ship sinks, but they aren't going to be capable of preventing the ship from sinking.
Not surprising when you think about how rare it is for women to build or invent something new that improves society. They wait for men to do the hard work then they come in and demand to be included.
Obviously there are a few exceptions but they're relatively rare.
Makes sense to me!
Rome did fine before they became Christian.