There are more male killers because they are more physically capable.
Women live vicariously through these killers. They know they aren't capable of harming a target that can fight back, hence their killings always being either poisonings, sleeping targets or infanticide.
I don't disagree its all vicarious, but the problem with vicarious living is there is still someone more guilty of the action than you. As in, the person actually committing it.
Everyone with a rape fetish is damaged goods.
If you can find a woman who made it to adulthood without being damaged in some form you should probably study her because that's not actually happening.
There are more male killers because they are more physically capable.
Or perhaps because they are less physically capable of killing, and evolved ways of getting what they want through controlling men, and subterfuge (and things like poisoning, sure) then whatever pathology leads to serial killing is less expressed in the female mind, and that's why there's fewer of them. That's a bit different than the implication you're drawing, that if they could just get away with it there'd be an equal number or more female serial killers.
They know they aren't capable of harming a target that can fight back
Aren't you always panicking about women literally murdering you in the streets or something? Either gunpowder has been invented in your timeline, or it has not been, but not both.
What I mean is that when women make these murderer worshipping movies/shows, they always show graphic, sadistic murder where the victim is overpowered then tortured.
They can't do that, they can only hit unwitting targets who don't see them.
As such, they live vicariously through the murderers that are capable of overpowering and slowly torturing their victims.
There are more male killers because they are more physically capable.
Women live vicariously through these killers. They know they aren't capable of harming a target that can fight back, hence their killings always being either poisonings, sleeping targets or infanticide.
Everyone with a rape fetish is damaged goods.
I don't disagree its all vicarious, but the problem with vicarious living is there is still someone more guilty of the action than you. As in, the person actually committing it.
If you can find a woman who made it to adulthood without being damaged in some form you should probably study her because that's not actually happening.
I'm not denying it, but the point I was making is that they do want to kill, but subconsciously understand their limitations in that regard.
There's levels of damaged, rape kink girls are near the top, just above the incest ones.
Or perhaps because they are less physically capable of killing, and evolved ways of getting what they want through controlling men, and subterfuge (and things like poisoning, sure) then whatever pathology leads to serial killing is less expressed in the female mind, and that's why there's fewer of them. That's a bit different than the implication you're drawing, that if they could just get away with it there'd be an equal number or more female serial killers.
Aren't you always panicking about women literally murdering you in the streets or something? Either gunpowder has been invented in your timeline, or it has not been, but not both.
You can't fight back against a gun either.
What I mean is that when women make these murderer worshipping movies/shows, they always show graphic, sadistic murder where the victim is overpowered then tortured.
They can't do that, they can only hit unwitting targets who don't see them.
As such, they live vicariously through the murderers that are capable of overpowering and slowly torturing their victims.
Sure you can.