You are really determined to ignore that Israel passed a law declaring itself a Jewish ethnostate.

And you are really determined to ignore that you uncritically cite MSM sources when they agree with your agenda. Regardless, the law did no such thing. You rely on the fact that you have not defined 'ethnostate', or you would have BTFO'd yourself with this.

If there were a similar law that said Europe should remain Christian then that would also be idpol.

No, that's called common sense. European culture is Christian, it is not Islamic. But I figure you disagree with it because you ally with Muslims against your dread state of Israel.

It was easy to find, and I knew most of that shit already

So you uncritically accept media propaganda when it fits your prejudices.

What a shocker.

A state dedicated to serving the interests of a specific race/ethnic group

All states serve the interests of the wealthy and giant corporations, and basically no one else.

It's all about prioritizing an identity.

Do you also think that it's "IDPol" to say that Europe is a Christian continent, which it is and should remain? No, it's just plain common sense. You just hate da Jooooz.

That law has been know for a while and talked about in other places.

My question is why you are citing stuff from people that you would rightly dismiss as propaganda if it were about any other country - specifically, one that was not inhabited by JOOOOOOOOZ.

I've known for years that Israel had other ethnicities besides Jews, long before my current beliefs. There is no confronting. Ethnostates need not be 100% pure.

So what's the criterion, genius?

Now explain how that law isn't idpol.

Explain how it is.