Typical leftist commie white double-standards bile
(media.communities.win)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Ha! I’ll throw that in their face next time I come across one of these creatures.
Accurate physiognomy for the type of clowns who have these logically inconsistent views
...
https://nypost.com/2020/12/29/white-teen-kicked-out-of-college-after-n-word-video-resurfaces/
It's not double standards, they simply lie about what their standards are.
Their standard is that anything that hurts white people is good.
19th Amendment.
If this was actually a position they held, we'd be talking about the racist origins of women's vote. We don't. Because it's all divisive bullshit to keep us from uniting against feminism.
It's called original sin instead of original pride for a reason.
discarding your ancestors, your history is a commie ploy to get you to discard your culture and accept existence as atomized, isolated livestock to be cared for by the state and treated like cattle.
What you're saying is very edgy and NRx an all but equality of opportunities is an okay goal all the same. Even if its impossible to 100% achieve.
The result of what you suggest is ..frankly shitty and inhuman.
Thank God civilized people in the West decided against it 200 years ago.
And we should be trying to give everyone a fair shake. A baseline from which every kid starts off equal. White kids, for example, born to poor, shitty parents shouldn't be doomed to Deaths of Despair forever, going down generations, on and on into infinity e.t.c e.t.c.
Hell, even if they fuck their entire lives up and are 50 years old we should be helping fellow citizens get their shit together and succeed.
It benefits us all.
Everyone sees this already. Lol. Seethe.
Equality of outcomes is ridiculous.
Its not.
It isn't (see end if this post).
I don't know what you're taking about here.
It isn't.
Concepts are important. Abstract thought is what sets humans apart from lower animals. See Piaget's theory of mental development.
Yes, that's true no matter what (equality minded or not)? Tolerance. Tolerance of both pain and pleasure. No matter the situation, people become used to it soon enough. But usually are recklessly wanting more, more, more.
Me:
You:
A jokey quip you apparently took seriously.
We're not living in the product of this one belief of mine we're living in a return to ethnic tribal identity which is particularly disastrous in a demographically multicultural society.
We were based on humanist liberalism.
Which I still champion a return to.
But no longer. That changed after Occupy Wall Street threatened those elites and so we got progressive stack and ID politics.
Me:
I guess it's only fair to offer my own proof. I often assume its self-evident for anyone involved or interested in geopolitics and history but... if you truly believe what you're saying (that equality is abhorrent) then apparently it's passed you by. Or I may just be wrong. So...
My proof is that
life expectancy,
wealth (both personal and society at large, now that there are less bread riots and revolutions to quell),
literacy and
amount of opportunities in life (to move, to better oneself, to escape abusive/disfunctional families, disengage from conformist/exploitative tribal alliances...think House Frey, to use one popular and I think apposite example... [1]
...have all, on average, increased for people blessed enough to live in post-Enlightenment Western nations.
Childhood death,
Enslavement,
Rape of sisters, mothers and daughters
(God knows what people sorry nowadays, I may have to defend the idea that rathore is abhorrent next!)
...have declined in those Western, civilized countries.
In fact you might say that equality is the bedrock of civilization itself. I dunno. Never thought of that before.
Granted:
This came at the expense of a larger class of elites. Of dedicated thinkers [2](ex. Newton) relaxing atop a pyramid of brutally overworked, hereditarily condemned, underclass slaves. But we still have enough at the top that enjoy their parental and hereditary wealth to sit back... enjoying a free and nearly unlimited creative pallet of opportunities to stream, experiment, fearlessly fail time and tune again knowing they'll be whisked off back home to recover and try once more, like modern day trustafarian gutter punks, like "George Orwell " (Eric Blair) etc.
Basically that a worldwide pyramid of slavery allows the people at the very top free time to discover more improvements. And that group was larger, in Europe, back then.
But we still have quite a large group in America currently. So... no fear there, lad! Your (neo) feudalism is safe... "for the nonce." (I really enjoyed SoIaF as read by Roy Dotrice, does it show?)
[1] Game of Thrones, if nothing else, presented the most realistic (even if all but one main character was nobility / 'high borne', most other renderings were even more rose-tinted), mass consumed (worldwide audience with people in India, Russia, Mexico and yes even the US still downloading the entire series, presumably some of whomever are watching it for the first time.And all this years after it concluded!) view into what life was like pre-Enlightenment.
It was a very successful memetic and, not by accident, coincided with the popularization of Neoreaction, which up to that point existed wholly in the shadows, say 0.2% not 2. Of course, like those espousing a Fascist or Communist form of government, those idealizing Feudalism 'oft as not' imagine themselves taking part in some exciting quest or, less likely still, "runnin shit" as an inner circle tyrant and not the more likely scenario where they're simply born into the wrong family a d doomed to a life of abject misery. Grinding away their entire lives from the time they can walk to the time they drop dead at the plow, working some nullifying, deadening, monotonous job year after year, surrounded by people who've never left the hamlet and can't read or multiply abstract numbers. Nevermind paint, compose poetry, lay about thinking of odd, edgy political possibilities to support, etc.
[2] "Refusal of work"
"Are you going to continue to make a series of declarative statements or are you going to fuckin' tell me something?" Sorry, couldn't resist.
The Guard script:
https://transcripts.thedealr.net/script.php/the-guard-2011-6Ser
Download:
https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.96/p2z.144.myftpupload.com/pdf/TheGuard.pdf
But yeah, now prove it.
You should try less hard. We're online. Nothing you or I say here really matters. Not to me at least. You'll hardly change your mind and at this point people who believe like you make up about 2% of the population so who reading this matters enough to put forth the effort? Really, I'm just passing the time waiting for other things more important to happen in real life.
I don't think you really know what humanist or liberalism mean. If you did you'd understand that humanist liberals no longer think of themselves as "middle eastern" or "south american" but as individuals untethered to ethnic or national identities.
People claim to be all sorts of things they are not to mask their greed. This isn't news to me.
Finally some useful and novel information. Thank you, kind sir.
It's not. Unless you think all if history is "pure fiction." I'm referring to Will Durant's "The Story of Civilization" (specifically vol. VII, and vol IX), HG Wells' "The Outline of History", John Hirst's "Shortest History of Europe", William H. McNeill's, "The Rise of the West: t: A History of the Human Community", and "Clio's Battles: Historiographyin Practice", by Jeremy Black.
("Clio's Battles" about how history is used to redesign reality and/or shore up support for various current day political causes, you might like, assuming you haven't already read it.)
This along with picking things up here and there from various wikis and articles. :-)
I already did. You prove nothing and just label things and say it's bad or associated with things you, apparently, dislike without offering evidence for why anyone else should dislike the first thing.
You claim equality is inhuman, violent and on and on, "a meme" (because you apparently don't know the definition of that word either), etc, without offering proof.
You just call names.
Then type, "lmao" like you've actually made a good point or really any point at all.
You're putting too much cream on your taco. A bit redundant dont you think? If they're the ruling class... manipulating and...using politics... then of course its "exploitative". That word isn't needed to make what passes for a point with you.
The sentence both obvious and completely unrelated to actual equality. Because...
As I already said:
It's also not reason to abandon my principles, even if they are claiming to represent my principles when they don't.
You still don't even know the definition if the word, "liberalism" even though I called this out three posts ago and the answer is a few swift keystrokes away.
You're using term you dont understand and cannot define.
So you differentiate "liberalism" into two new things, neither of which matches the definition of the word.
Stop posting.
Pick up a basic political encyclopedia and start reading.
I'm calling liberalism what liberalism is generally acknowledged to be defined as. This is how words and language work.
I've never stated a goal. You're assuming and strawmanning some spook that doesn't exist. Or someone that you talked to before me. Or maybe imagined in a fever dream of tangled, sweaty sheets.
Total jibberish and and a juvenile political worldview of "you're all the same (strawman) that I'm easily defeating because (straw)"
Goofy. Now I'm not just "one of THEM" ...I'm worse than THEM.
Simple minds simplify the world. You, sir, are simple-minded.
Which is what?
Again, what the fuck are you even taking about? Give examples otherwise you're spouting a string of catchphrases.
So now you've established that toy don't know the definition of oh let's see...
liberalism
identity politics
equality
I'm sure there will be more.
Didn't have to wait long there did I?
Total nonsense.
Word salad. Pick up a political encyclopedia.
All you do is call things derogatory names. Somehow you think this constitutes an actual argument.
Nothing I says is a ambiguous. Pure projection.
I'm not.
Well thanks, I guess.
Lol, you don't say?
Nothing you're saying makes sense. Then you make my point for me. But I said that three posts up, old son. So... what are you in about?
You don't think equality is good.
Get back to why... not just explaining redundantly that people lie and use the term to mask anti-White ideology and replacement.
:-)
Adding this edit here because edits on win never seem to show up.
It isn't. Edit: actually you are technically right it is a meme. An idea that acts as a gene and has, thankfully, spread and replicated.
Also, I didn't downvote you. Here, have an up... for what it's worth (nothing, in the bigger scheme of things).