Yup, and the state court ruled against him there. He appealed to the supreme court, and they ruled for him. When the tranny heard he won on appeal, they put in a request for their tranny cake. Back to step one...
If there's anything the SCOTUS doesn't like as a whole, it's lower courts ignoring them - even from the justices that disagree with the precedent. For something this recent, I could
even see a unanimous decision in favor of the baker, or kicking it back to the lower courts telling them they fucked up big time ala Caetano.
Of course, that doesn't really do anything about Mr. Mentally Ill using the process as the punishment.
People have traveled multiple states just to target this guy
Yup, and the state court ruled against him there. He appealed to the supreme court, and they ruled for him. When the tranny heard he won on appeal, they put in a request for their tranny cake. Back to step one...
How is that not malice?
It's only malice if the woke judge says it is
If there's anything the SCOTUS doesn't like as a whole, it's lower courts ignoring them - even from the justices that disagree with the precedent. For something this recent, I could even see a unanimous decision in favor of the baker, or kicking it back to the lower courts telling them they fucked up big time ala Caetano.
Of course, that doesn't really do anything about Mr. Mentally Ill using the process as the punishment.