One thing you will notice a lot is people talking about Critical Race Theory, but never the original Critical Theory. That's because the link to the Frankfurt school's cultural marxism is just too evident. It is a direct connection between communism, jewish identity, and academia. To say otherwise would just be a lie. You only need to go look at the Wikipedia page to see that.
Postmodernism, women's studies, the sexual revolution and so called "Queer theory" are also direct descendants of that lineage. This has been largely ignored as a talking point in favour of looking at the race issue only.
Women have generally been childlike. Spoiled children are always rotten. It's only in the absence of the patriarch; providing guidance to women and children, and protecting them from external threats and themselves, that the bad shit tends to come out. I think women are also more likely to be spoiled as children by a doting father.
Of course, male children become rotten without a patriarch, as well. So it's hard to put it all on women.
It's always the same motte and bailey bullshit with leftists.
"Disparate Impact Theory isn't anti-white or communist. It's a neutral framework for exploring possible reasons and causes for disparate outcomes between different groups of people."
And it just so happens to discover the exact same reasons and causes (racism and white supremacists) in every case. Because you rejected alternative explanations (individual decisions, crappy cultures) as invalid before you even began your "investigation". And then you found the exact same "solutions" (redistribution of wealth and opportunity from whites to non-whites) for all of the problems.
You're not smart. It's not difficult to reverse engineer your garbage ideas.
One thing you will notice a lot is people talking about Critical Race Theory, but never the original Critical Theory. That's because the link to the Frankfurt school's cultural marxism is just too evident. It is a direct connection between communism, jewish identity, and academia. To say otherwise would just be a lie. You only need to go look at the Wikipedia page to see that.
Postmodernism, women's studies, the sexual revolution and so called "Queer theory" are also direct descendants of that lineage. This has been largely ignored as a talking point in favour of looking at the race issue only.
Women have always been rotten, literature from any era of any society show that. Hell, even Greek mythology had false rape accusations in it.
Women have generally been childlike. Spoiled children are always rotten. It's only in the absence of the patriarch; providing guidance to women and children, and protecting them from external threats and themselves, that the bad shit tends to come out. I think women are also more likely to be spoiled as children by a doting father.
Of course, male children become rotten without a patriarch, as well. So it's hard to put it all on women.
It's always the same motte and bailey bullshit with leftists.
"Disparate Impact Theory isn't anti-white or communist. It's a neutral framework for exploring possible reasons and causes for disparate outcomes between different groups of people."
And it just so happens to discover the exact same reasons and causes (racism and white supremacists) in every case. Because you rejected alternative explanations (individual decisions, crappy cultures) as invalid before you even began your "investigation". And then you found the exact same "solutions" (redistribution of wealth and opportunity from whites to non-whites) for all of the problems.
You're not smart. It's not difficult to reverse engineer your garbage ideas.
Genetics, evolutionary biology, IQ, personality traits, inferiority complexes, resentment, envy, outgroup hatred, group selection, superstition.
I kind of want to create a web site that lists the line of citations that ultimately lead back to the Frankfort school.