the fact that most transitioners are little kids has no bearing on anything then?
Is that a fact, that "most" transitioners are less than 10 years old?
AGP was an attempt to deflect blame from feminism onto pornography.
No, it was by Ray Blanchard, who unlike you knows what he's talking about.
It's bigger bullshit than their attempt at pretending C19 wasn't caused by feminists.
Considering that you claim that 20% of white babies are aborted and then replaced by illegal immigrants to make sure that no one notices, I'm not sure you're the one we should look to to determine what's 'bullshit'.
So you have no evidence, as usual? And you shifted the goalposts from '10-year-old' (who would not do something like this for sexual reasons) to 'minor', which invalidates your entire point as a 17-year-old can be expected to do that for sexual reasons?
Good show.
Who created the theory isn't important. It's what it's used for.
AGP was an attempt to deflect blame from feminism onto pornography.
No, this doesn't explain a phenomenon that almost perfectly tracks the shift of culture towards deifying women.
It's almost as if there are other things going on in 'culture' other than the things you exclusively concern yourself with.
And this contradicts your earlier claims that women transition because they believe 'male privilege'. If women are increasingly 'deified', one would expect that number to decrease rather than increase.
As usual, you're good at one thing - contradicting yourself.
Zhengli and Yanyi are of course famously male. Covid-19 is also completely natural and was not modified to harm men more at all.
You're so on the ropes that you try a red herring: "see, try this other crazy claim of mine rather than the ones I'm making here!"
Whatever happened to your $10 bet that women would be exempted from taking the AZ vaccine, by the way? Or your claim that it was part of 'The Genocide'? Seems like the AZ vaccine, which you claimed was "created by women to kill men", did a bad job at that, but a good job at combating the virus... that you also believe was "created by women to kill men".
Nonsense, there is plenty of data. Often used by them. For example, one of the advocates had a chart showing that a lot of girls have their breasts removed at age 12 and 13.
Using AGP as an explanation for this* was an attempt. Happy now?
No, because that was not my intent at all.
Both can simultaneously be true. Remember that boys and girls are treated so differently by society, they basically live in different worlds.
You judge something to be true not if there is any empirical evidence for it, but based on whether it is consistent with your narrative. That is the mark of an ideologue.
Clearly, if women mutilate themselves to get 'male privilege', as is your claim, that would decrease and not increase as women are 'increasingly deified' as is also your claim.
I wasn't doing that. I used it as an example of feminists doing what they do best, telling everyone that they had nothing to do with something they clearly had a lot to do with.
First of all, it goes without saying that you never established that those two were feminists, or that this was a bioweapon, let alone your hare-brained claim that it was intentionally altered to literally kill you.
That said, you're making the claim that... people who have done something wrong then try to cover that up? Wow, what great heights of insight.
Is that a fact, that "most" transitioners are less than 10 years old?
No, it was by Ray Blanchard, who unlike you knows what he's talking about.
Considering that you claim that 20% of white babies are aborted and then replaced by illegal immigrants to make sure that no one notices, I'm not sure you're the one we should look to to determine what's 'bullshit'.
So you have no evidence, as usual? And you shifted the goalposts from '10-year-old' (who would not do something like this for sexual reasons) to 'minor', which invalidates your entire point as a 17-year-old can be expected to do that for sexual reasons?
Good show.
AGP was an attempt to deflect blame from feminism onto pornography.
It's almost as if there are other things going on in 'culture' other than the things you exclusively concern yourself with.
And this contradicts your earlier claims that women transition because they believe 'male privilege'. If women are increasingly 'deified', one would expect that number to decrease rather than increase.
As usual, you're good at one thing - contradicting yourself.
You're so on the ropes that you try a red herring: "see, try this other crazy claim of mine rather than the ones I'm making here!"
Whatever happened to your $10 bet that women would be exempted from taking the AZ vaccine, by the way? Or your claim that it was part of 'The Genocide'? Seems like the AZ vaccine, which you claimed was "created by women to kill men", did a bad job at that, but a good job at combating the virus... that you also believe was "created by women to kill men".
Nonsense, there is plenty of data. Often used by them. For example, one of the advocates had a chart showing that a lot of girls have their breasts removed at age 12 and 13.
No, because that was not my intent at all.
You judge something to be true not if there is any empirical evidence for it, but based on whether it is consistent with your narrative. That is the mark of an ideologue.
Clearly, if women mutilate themselves to get 'male privilege', as is your claim, that would decrease and not increase as women are 'increasingly deified' as is also your claim.
First of all, it goes without saying that you never established that those two were feminists, or that this was a bioweapon, let alone your hare-brained claim that it was intentionally altered to literally kill you.
That said, you're making the claim that... people who have done something wrong then try to cover that up? Wow, what great heights of insight.