I'm very bored. Ask me anything you want. Are we even allowed to do this kind of post?
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (100)
sorted by:
They've always been teachers, and they've always been office support staff. The politics part is the only thing vaguely new.
Not always. Teaching used to be a male-dominated profession.
Fair enough, but we made it about 100 years without too many ill-effects. Women weren't so much a root problem, just an easily exploitable vector of subversion.
Exactly. Every society has it's weakest points, and women can be a large one. This is why treating women exactly like men and expecting them to act contrary to their nature leads to many problems. If they under-perform you're not simply allowed to say that without facing backlash.
Much worse is the force that drives that wedge deeper into society in order to break up power and take it for itself, knowing full well the amount of suffering and destruction it can cause.
Women cannot be that ultimate cause, especially in a monogamous society. For humanity to exist it needs men and women, and either one needs to be suppressed or they work in tandem. If deep down men or women in general wanted the other utterly destroyed, it would have already happened by now and there would be no humans.
They don't want all the men gone, just those who don't have a hot body, are shorter than 6 ft, don't have a huge dick, and don't have 6 figures in the bank.
I do kind of agree, but at the same time, I don't think they had the sheer numbers of psychotic sadists in these professions that they do now.
It's a psychotic sadism that has been nurtured, though. The numbers have absolutely increased, but that's to be expected when everything around them tells them that this is "right" and "true" and "virtuous". Bad people control the zeitgeist, and the zeitgeist controls women.
I don't believe this theory, no one can convince you to do something you don't want to.
Here's a ridiculous example, but it proves the point.
If the whole world media told people that incest was good, would people start screwing their siblings?
Give it time. It's an angle being worked.
Granted, I think we're going to reset things before we get to that point, but no bridge seems too far.
Edit:
This should be addressed. You're not looking at this correctly. We all want to do terrible things, at least at some level. That's human nature. The issue arises when society (or at least the perception of society) gives you license for your terrible desires.
Given enough time, almost certainly they would. Our behavior is shaped by social norms, which the media has a big part in shaping. Human nature isn’t as set in stone as you seem to think. In Ancient Greece, buttfucking little boys was the norm.
There were a few diseases known "aristocratic diseases" that were the result of royalties preference for marrying their own cousins.
Not as far off as you might think.
You know I could say the same for stormcucks, right? You'll believe any bullshit if you can protect your precious white women.
We're probably 6 or 7 generations into that. The single mother and patriarchy things were products of the 60's, and the fashionable rejection of tradition that came with it. That's when Marxist infiltration really started to find broad success in the US, though it had been brewing and adapting, largely in NYC, since the 1890's.