It's not about embracing it, it's about acknowledging who you are and what makes you who you are.
If you think your skin color makes you who you are, you are promoting the bio-leninism that will destroy you.
There are countless answers he could have given that are much better than this one; I for one, would have also brought up my ethnicity - and the person he was talking to even gave him some examples, but all he's done is to complain about characterization of whites by rad libs, and then re-assert liberal individualism.
Good.
Although I, too, would have gone a different way. Reverse the question and have him answer what's positive about being black, and tear him to shreds no matter what he says.
You're right, your ideology is clouding your judgement. You're arguing against a point I didn't make as if I were a normie.
I didn't even allege that all races were equal, or that there were no genetic differences between races. There has to be, that's one of the reasons people are different colors.
That doesn't change my point that the genetic differences between races are not the sole, or even primary, explanation for the disparity of behaviors.
As I said here, racialism will promote the bio-leninism you hope to avoid with racialism, because you are denying personal responsibility and accountability for change and improvement.
While there are genetic limits to the capabilities of all individuals, the boundaries of those limits are so narrow in the mind of racial determinists that they think all behavior can be determined solely through genetics. This is demonstrably false, and not what any single geneticist would ever argue. Furthermore, there is still a problem with the categorizaiton of race because it is still only an inter-temporal statistical abstraction of mostly self-identifying individuals. It is not a good tool for measuring genetic sub-categories of humans.
I never said that, but if you want me to be more specific, if you think the genetics that inform your skin color are the primary determining factor of your behavior, you will be rewarding poorly cultured bio-leninist whites with the ability to take credit for the success of other whites, and deny personal responsibility in improving themselves while blaming other races/ethnicities/lesser-whites for their failures.
Racialism is always designed to be an excuse wielded by useful idiots to enshrine the lead racialists into positions of power. It is nothing else.
When you excuse changing behavior by pointing at genetics, you promote individual unaccountability. You guarantee stagnation and decay, first among individuals, then among society.
Rufo is a classic liberal and he is a White man married to a Asian woman.
Rufo believes in color blindness.
You won't see someone like Rufo embracing his White heritage.
This is how I expected him to answer.
Rufo has been very good for optics and he has been the most successful individual in terms of chipping away at CRT.
I see the points that you and Darren are bringing up but you won't be able to stop CRT by embracing white racialism.
If you think your skin color makes you who you are, you are promoting the bio-leninism that will destroy you.
Good.
Although I, too, would have gone a different way. Reverse the question and have him answer what's positive about being black, and tear him to shreds no matter what he says.
It's a rhetorical trap.
You're right, your ideology is clouding your judgement. You're arguing against a point I didn't make as if I were a normie.
I didn't even allege that all races were equal, or that there were no genetic differences between races. There has to be, that's one of the reasons people are different colors.
That doesn't change my point that the genetic differences between races are not the sole, or even primary, explanation for the disparity of behaviors.
As I said here, racialism will promote the bio-leninism you hope to avoid with racialism, because you are denying personal responsibility and accountability for change and improvement.
While there are genetic limits to the capabilities of all individuals, the boundaries of those limits are so narrow in the mind of racial determinists that they think all behavior can be determined solely through genetics. This is demonstrably false, and not what any single geneticist would ever argue. Furthermore, there is still a problem with the categorizaiton of race because it is still only an inter-temporal statistical abstraction of mostly self-identifying individuals. It is not a good tool for measuring genetic sub-categories of humans.
Oh here we go again with the absurd premise that race is just physical appearance.
I never said that, but if you want me to be more specific, if you think the genetics that inform your skin color are the primary determining factor of your behavior, you will be rewarding poorly cultured bio-leninist whites with the ability to take credit for the success of other whites, and deny personal responsibility in improving themselves while blaming other races/ethnicities/lesser-whites for their failures.
Racialism is always designed to be an excuse wielded by useful idiots to enshrine the lead racialists into positions of power. It is nothing else.
When you excuse changing behavior by pointing at genetics, you promote individual unaccountability. You guarantee stagnation and decay, first among individuals, then among society.
Are Germans similar to Turks? Both are white