Everyone gets it. You don't like wrongthink and want to see it banned. If that were to happen, you think the site would grow.
I, and many others, would see that as the beginning of the end. When you start banning one wrongthink, all wrongthink is on the table. Once that's happened, congrats, you've started to stifle conversation. Now you're susceptible to infection in your community. Leftist start coming, find a position of power, change everything you liked about a place, and you have to create a new site and try again.
All because you couldn't handle some /pol/ posting.
Lol.
Everyone gets it. You don't like wrongthink and want to see it banned. If that were to happen, you think the site would grow.
I, and many others, would see that as the beginning of the end. When you start banning one wrongthink, all wrongthink is on the table. Once that's happened, congrats, you've started to stifle conversation. Now you're susceptible to infection in your community. Leftist start coming, find a position of power, change everything you liked about a place, and you have to create a new site and try again.
All because you couldn't handle some /pol/ posting.
I have faith that with open discussion, the right ideas will win out. It's clear you do not.
Let the ideas stand on their own merit and users gatekeep as they see fit. A blank ban is not the right approach.
Can you name a site that has followed what you suggested and has thrived?