White supremacy! I'm sure kids in schools in China, India, Ghana, etc. are actually encouraged to disrespect their teachers and "change the power dynamics". Only white countries where you are not in school to holler at the teacher like some dumb ape gutter trash. Nice that we have established that one.
Another thing is, they use the buzzword 'powerhoarding'. This is coming from some administrator or diversity officer. You know, the kind of people who actually assert this bullshit SJW power over normal people because they sucked dick and smoked weed on their parents' money for a few years at some useless college in underwater indigenous masturbatory dance therapy.
But teachers are the ones hoarding power. Not useless people who try to ruin the lives of everyone and brainwash other people's children like the fucking predators they are. OKAY.
But it's interesting that a mathematics teacher pointing out that 2+2=5 is incorrect is "powerhoarding", while I'm sure they won't apply the same standard to 'teachers' of their race hustling.
They want students to challenge a mathematics teacher, but not a CRT teacher.
I hope there's a rise in school shootings where the shooters only go after the faculty. Marxism won't end naturally, it needs to be killed out of existence.
When students bring a different approach to doing math, teachers often get defensive and see it as a challenge to the power structures in the classroom
More like they get frustrated because little Jimmy's "different approach" only works half the time, or they can't explain how they got the answer so they don'tactuallyunderstand what it is they were supposed to learn, or they can explain but it turns out their "different approach" is just a more complicated/ less useful version of what you are trying to teach them. I 100% guarantee there are no middle or high schoolers figuring completely new methods and equations by themselves.
I can only see stuff like this and common core as deliberate attempts to reduce children's ability and desire to learn. Common core makes it non intuitive and literally slows thinking, while this stuff creates an entire separate topic to get distracted worrying about.
I remember seeing a study a couple of years ago where they tested different methods of teaching math to to find one that reduced demographic differences.
They colcluded that some specific order of teaching concepts worked best, and recommended it.
You'd have to dive down and look at the data to see that the new pedagogic paradigm succeeded by making the material confusing, and equity had been achieved by reducing everyones scores but reducing the scores of the best students the most dramatically.
Deep down they must know that differences in outcomes are biological in nature, and that there is nothing they can do to erase them besides sabotage.
Unique to mathematics is the idea that new learning comes from the teacher.
WRONG. The professorial system has existed for hundreds of years. The reason new subjects come from the professor is because the professor is professing the knowledge he has studied and learned, that you can now absorb and add into your own experiments as needed.
The Progressive Industrial Education system that Leftists built bastardizes that and sets the teacher as manager to cover basic instruction and control the student's workflow.
While we need to guide students learning, we need to focus primarily on assisting them on how to teach themselves by guiding experiential knowledge through experimentation.
Literally ZERO of the above is unique to mathematics, you liars.
the idea is often that teachers provide learning
Yes, because most teaching environments are controlled environments, because we actually have knowledge of past things. I know Leftists like destroying previous knowledge because only Communism can bring knowledge, but we're not all retarded and previous knowledge did exist before you got here and took a shit on the floor.
Again, the professorial system exists to introduce students to the new information, because the professor just discovered it.
This reinforces the ideas of paternalism and powerhoarding.
Leftism is entirely built around paternalism. As for powerhoarding, I told you guys that "hoarding" would come back. The Left uses that term whenever they demand "the right" to seize your shit. If you have authority, the Leftist has the right to strip it from you because you're powerhoarding. If you want power from the leftist, you're undermining democracy and the experts.
When students bring a different approach to doing math, teachers often get defensive and see it as a challenge to the power structures in the class room.
Every person has a right to defend themselves against a Communist saying something fucking retarded. You can't just redefine words until you're right. If you want to be right about something, you'll actually have to be right, and Leftists never are.
There are plenty of ways to work within mathematics to abide by the basic arithmetic postulates and procedures. The reason that arithmetic and algebra have rules is because all of it's rules are interdependent on generating an accurate result. If you wish to use a slightly different procedure, you can only do that if you apply it consistently, and if the results are as expected.
While you can use PEMDAS for 2 + 3 * 4 to get 14, you can also use
Chain input for 2 + 3 * 4 to get 20,
but you need to specify which system you are using and why so we can be consistent. It's less about "getting what the white supremacist establishment thinks is the right answer" and is more about, "identifying what the fuck you're talking about".
When students bring a different approach to doing math
Simple question: Does the different approach produce the correct answer? Does it WORK? Why does it work?
If a kid 'works out' that 6 x 6 = 36 by simply memorizing the multiplication table, it works. It's useful.
If a kid works out that 6 x 6 = 36 by by remembering 6 x 2 = 12 and that 12 x 3 = 36, that also works and is also useful.
If a kid does 6 + 6 + 6 + 6 + 6 + 6 on their fingers, well, that's not great, but it DOES work, and if they can do it fast enough, they can probably struggle their way to a grade C. Still useful.
If a kid thinks 6+6 is slightly more than 10, and if I do it two more times it's gonna be more-than-slightly-more than 30, so I'm gonna guess a number in the mid 30's, well, congrats on the successful ballpark figure, and if the kid actually explained how they came to that number they're, uh... pretty lazy, but their brain is actually working. Enjoy your grade F, but take solace in the fact that you are smart enough to do better if you try.
If a kid just writes 66, and when asked what the fuck they're smoking says 'SIX TIME SIX A' SIXTY SIX! IT JUS' SOUNDS RIGHT TO ME!' it doesn't work, it's not useful, and the kid is a fucking dunce.
I think the worst are the galaxy-brained mid-wits on twitter that might make some dumb argument like: but in programming, if you concatenate strings i.e. "6" + "6", then you'd get "66", so he's not wrong. I hate the 2+2=5 arguments with a passion because they are so willfully disingenuous and generally boils down to a mistranslation or redefining of terms mid-equation. 10 + 10 doesn't equal 100 just because you calculated the result in binary and then read it in decimal again.
White supremacy! I'm sure kids in schools in China, India, Ghana, etc. are actually encouraged to disrespect their teachers and "change the power dynamics". Only white countries where you are not in school to holler at the teacher like some dumb ape gutter trash. Nice that we have established that one.
Another thing is, they use the buzzword 'powerhoarding'. This is coming from some administrator or diversity officer. You know, the kind of people who actually assert this bullshit SJW power over normal people because they sucked dick and smoked weed on their parents' money for a few years at some useless college in underwater indigenous masturbatory dance therapy.
But teachers are the ones hoarding power. Not useless people who try to ruin the lives of everyone and brainwash other people's children like the fucking predators they are. OKAY.
They actually did it in China, with the Red Guards.
That is the rankest lunacy I've ever seen.
But it's interesting that a mathematics teacher pointing out that 2+2=5 is incorrect is "powerhoarding", while I'm sure they won't apply the same standard to 'teachers' of their race hustling.
They want students to challenge a mathematics teacher, but not a CRT teacher.
I hope there's a rise in school shootings where the shooters only go after the faculty. Marxism won't end naturally, it needs to be killed out of existence.
While citing "targeting white oppressors" in the manifesto?
More like they get frustrated because little Jimmy's "different approach" only works half the time, or they can't explain how they got the answer so they don'tactuallyunderstand what it is they were supposed to learn, or they can explain but it turns out their "different approach" is just a more complicated/ less useful version of what you are trying to teach them. I 100% guarantee there are no middle or high schoolers figuring completely new methods and equations by themselves.
I can only see stuff like this and common core as deliberate attempts to reduce children's ability and desire to learn. Common core makes it non intuitive and literally slows thinking, while this stuff creates an entire separate topic to get distracted worrying about.
I remember seeing a study a couple of years ago where they tested different methods of teaching math to to find one that reduced demographic differences.
They colcluded that some specific order of teaching concepts worked best, and recommended it.
You'd have to dive down and look at the data to see that the new pedagogic paradigm succeeded by making the material confusing, and equity had been achieved by reducing everyones scores but reducing the scores of the best students the most dramatically.
Deep down they must know that differences in outcomes are biological in nature, and that there is nothing they can do to erase them besides sabotage.
Yes that's the point.
WRONG. The professorial system has existed for hundreds of years. The reason new subjects come from the professor is because the professor is professing the knowledge he has studied and learned, that you can now absorb and add into your own experiments as needed.
The Progressive Industrial Education system that Leftists built bastardizes that and sets the teacher as manager to cover basic instruction and control the student's workflow.
While we need to guide students learning, we need to focus primarily on assisting them on how to teach themselves by guiding experiential knowledge through experimentation.
Literally ZERO of the above is unique to mathematics, you liars.
Yes, because most teaching environments are controlled environments, because we actually have knowledge of past things. I know Leftists like destroying previous knowledge because only Communism can bring knowledge, but we're not all retarded and previous knowledge did exist before you got here and took a shit on the floor.
Again, the professorial system exists to introduce students to the new information, because the professor just discovered it.
Leftism is entirely built around paternalism. As for powerhoarding, I told you guys that "hoarding" would come back. The Left uses that term whenever they demand "the right" to seize your shit. If you have authority, the Leftist has the right to strip it from you because you're powerhoarding. If you want power from the leftist, you're undermining democracy and the experts.
Every person has a right to defend themselves against a Communist saying something fucking retarded. You can't just redefine words until you're right. If you want to be right about something, you'll actually have to be right, and Leftists never are.
There are plenty of ways to work within mathematics to abide by the basic arithmetic postulates and procedures. The reason that arithmetic and algebra have rules is because all of it's rules are interdependent on generating an accurate result. If you wish to use a slightly different procedure, you can only do that if you apply it consistently, and if the results are as expected.
While you can use PEMDAS for 2 + 3 * 4 to get 14, you can also use
Chain input for 2 + 3 * 4 to get 20,
but you need to specify which system you are using and why so we can be consistent. It's less about "getting what the white supremacist establishment thinks is the right answer" and is more about, "identifying what the fuck you're talking about".
Simple question: Does the different approach produce the correct answer? Does it WORK? Why does it work?
If a kid 'works out' that 6 x 6 = 36 by simply memorizing the multiplication table, it works. It's useful.
If a kid works out that 6 x 6 = 36 by by remembering 6 x 2 = 12 and that 12 x 3 = 36, that also works and is also useful.
If a kid does 6 + 6 + 6 + 6 + 6 + 6 on their fingers, well, that's not great, but it DOES work, and if they can do it fast enough, they can probably struggle their way to a grade C. Still useful.
If a kid thinks 6+6 is slightly more than 10, and if I do it two more times it's gonna be more-than-slightly-more than 30, so I'm gonna guess a number in the mid 30's, well, congrats on the successful ballpark figure, and if the kid actually explained how they came to that number they're, uh... pretty lazy, but their brain is actually working. Enjoy your grade F, but take solace in the fact that you are smart enough to do better if you try.
If a kid just writes 66, and when asked what the fuck they're smoking says 'SIX TIME SIX A' SIXTY SIX! IT JUS' SOUNDS RIGHT TO ME!' it doesn't work, it's not useful, and the kid is a fucking dunce.
I think the worst are the galaxy-brained mid-wits on twitter that might make some dumb argument like: but in programming, if you concatenate strings i.e. "6" + "6", then you'd get "66", so he's not wrong. I hate the 2+2=5 arguments with a passion because they are so willfully disingenuous and generally boils down to a mistranslation or redefining of terms mid-equation. 10 + 10 doesn't equal 100 just because you calculated the result in binary and then read it in decimal again.