What about those reporters who act like January 6th was worse than 9/11 and British attacking White House combined? The same reporters who were so concerned about Capitol police getting hurt and documenting every nasty thing that was said but can’t be bothered to factually cover the damage to the communities that the blm riots caused.
I remember a similar reaction to a video of Michael Brown intimidating a shop-keeper, before He got himself shot. You already noticed, but I'm going to say it. They don't give a damned about the truth, it's about making themselves feel good. Can't risk the useful idiots seeing the truth of what their actions cause.
This would be the same Intercept that Greenwald left because they'd become partisan hacks, yes?
Specifically, carrying water for Biden and the DNC, such as refusing to cover stories that would be bad PR for the same.
They didn't let him blog on his own website.
What about those reporters who act like January 6th was worse than 9/11 and British attacking White House combined? The same reporters who were so concerned about Capitol police getting hurt and documenting every nasty thing that was said but can’t be bothered to factually cover the damage to the communities that the blm riots caused.
Don't you get it? They were ARMED with DANGEROUS zip ties. Do you know how many countries have been OVERTHROWN with zip ties?!
If Trump does decide to run again, they will bring this up endlessly
The comment section does give me hope.
Indeed, though some of those guys are in full defence mode:
You heard it here first, gentlemen - that shop window over there started it!
how is it a smear if they're just showing objective reality?
I remember a similar reaction to a video of Michael Brown intimidating a shop-keeper, before He got himself shot. You already noticed, but I'm going to say it. They don't give a damned about the truth, it's about making themselves feel good. Can't risk the useful idiots seeing the truth of what their actions cause.
It's called "advocacy journalism".