Most of it's because we're all tired of the same fucking schtick forever. We get it, you think it's the Jews and nothing ever else because you believe in no other concept of power dynamics beyond eternal race war and you're upset because you think the Jews are winning and the whites are loosing.
We got the fucking message, and you're still wrong.
The part after this is where someone calls me a jew for disagreeing.
No I don't think it's the jews and absolutely nothing else. I just find it interesting how the discussion is a mind killer for people here.
Hmmm there's clearly a coordinated push that's racially and politically motivated to disenfranchise conservatives, whites, patriots, etc. But the second you mention that a disproportionate amount of people pushing this are the same ethnicity, which also happens to have its own ethnostate already, suddenly its some vast conspiracy? And you can't talk about it anymore?
Like Elon Musk asking "who controls the media" meaning just the rich, but every journo immediately took it as an antisemitic attack. Real interesting
Are there other explanations for why Jews have such disproportionate power over media and why it's used to attack whites? Of course, but shrieking like a harpy and insulting people for pointing out cohencidences only drives people further into believing that. You're not changing their minds by shrieking "REEEEEE STORMFAG! THE JEWS DO NOTHING WRONG!" Especially when you're shrieking at the wrong target.
I'm here for open discussion of any and every possibility no matter how distasteful. I only see Tony sperging out at Impossibro for replacing the jews in stormfag thinking with women; when really if you want to be ideologically consistent, you should be too. As well as anyone else who shits themselves at the mention of Judaism. But no, the shrieking only comes out when it's specifically jews mentioned.
I just find it interesting how the discussion is a mind killer for people here.
That's like saying someone is being closed minded when don't want to put their hand on a hot stove. No one's being "closed minded" to you and other's like you ranting about the Jews. It's the same shit it always has been, it's always wrong, and it always results in someone explaining why Hitler was a good boy who dindu nuffin and was just on his way to college, and he totally wasn't a Leftist. ... so in the end you still end up promoting racial justice, leftism, and the balkanization of the country.
If you were so ideologically inclined to cover the issue, and not just another person literally blaming the jews for their life not being together.
You might as well claim I'm a sex traitor who's not recognizing the pattern of women's cabal against men when TheImpossible1 starts up.
Are there other explanations for why Jews have such disproportionate power over media
I could go over the book "Immigration And Culture" with you, but you'd have to be willing to listen. Disparity does not equal Discrimination.
why it's used to attack whites?
White Leftism, like many European ideologies including Catholocism, builds off of shame. Some people can be shamed into obedience. It's a collectivist mindset that continental Europe has had for a very long time.
Of course, but shrieking like a harpy and insulting people for pointing out cohencidences only drives people further into believing that.
Only because they are promoting self-victimization in order for them to feel like they need the protection of white racialists, like all other ones.
You're not changing their minds by shrieking "REEEEEE STORMFAG! THE JEWS DO NOTHING WRONG!"
Nothing's going to change their minds until they change their emotion about the thing. This is the same issue that I have with Holocaust Denial. It's purely motivated reasoning. I shouldn't have to explain to a Holocaust "skeptic" that there was more than one death camp, or that the Germans stopped shooting people in favor of gas trucks. But, that's the level of ignorance tied to an emotion that happens with every conversation about the Holocaust. If it were emotionless, it would be a useful, but fairly academic discussion.
But it's not, because the argument isn't really "The facts of different issues within the Holocaust are up for debate." The argument is: "The jews lied to me."
And it goes the same way every time. It's always the Jews fault, it's always about how the world is defined solely along racial tribalism, it's always that the Jews are uniquely the most dangerous and subversive race, it's always that there's an evil about them genetically, and it always ends with White Socialism is the only way for progress.
No, the racialism has to get confronted early and often when it's getting pushed early and often. It's no fucking different from going to a Leftist sub, talking about a police shooting, and some asshole saying, "If he was black, he would have been killed. Did you know police are slave patrols?"
It's Leftist subversion and there needs to be a response to it. But how many times to I have to explain that the police aren't slave patrols until they stop? Never. It's not based in reality, it's based in emotion.
If they want to act like an individual and listen to honest dialogue, then fine, show it to me. Apotheosis (a Christian Identity user) has. He'll rationalize his position until the cows come home, and he'll defend White Christian National Socialism and claim the Jews are innately satanic. But once I get past his first level of posturing for the crowd (because that's what his first comment will always be about), he can still have a discussion.
I only see Tony sperging out at Impossibro for replacing the jews in stormfag thinking with women; when really if you want to be ideologically consistent, you should be too.
For the most part, it's just him fucking ranting. I'd rather play with him a bit so he mellows out over time and realizes he can't blame women for all of his problems. It's just him, and there's not an active political push by fringe Incels to squat on boards and be particularly vile to users who disagree with them.
For example, he has never called me a gender traitor, a secret woman subverter, working on behalf of the femoid cabal, or just straight up a woman.
TheImpossible1 has the capacity for humor, and he doesn't have dozens of people prepared to jump in and rant with him, creating a hysterical environment of paranoid woman-haters.
the Germans stopped shooting people in favor of gas trucks.
yeah the germans tooled around all day in modified trucks that have never been found, spending valuable wartime fuel suffocating millions. kinda like when that rowdy tour group who pulled pranks at the capitol earlier this year was actually a deadly insurrection possibly worse than 9/11. it's history and i believe it as we're supposed to
That and you might think that executing all of Europe's Jews is a waste of resources, but that's your own fault for not understanding a) Socialism, b) National Socialism, c) Hitler's idea that he was literally trying to save Europe from the Jews.
When socialists decide that something is important, they sacrifice their resources to it. They have planned economies for a reason, and accept the problems that come with it to achieve those issues. Hitler believed that if he didn't eradicate the Jews from Europe entirely, then they would utterly destroy Europe until there was nothing left. Not only did they use fuel, they used men, they used ammunition, they used policing forces, they used railway cars and time, damn near up to the very end of the war because they believed what they were doing was of monumental importance and a heroic good for the world.
You'll notice that Stalin also had no problems purging his own military during active military campaigns, and also massacred thousands of Polish officers at Khatyn despite the fact that he could have absorbed them into the Soviet Army.
Fucking tilting at windmills mate. I've been very clear that I'm not a stormfag but you go off full speed as if I was one. This is what I meant by mindkilling. You see someone mention early life or say "cohencidence" (which I just think is a hilarious portmanteau that really has no use outside of these discussions)
But yeah, just cut context out of my reply so you can keep tilting at that windmill Don Gizortnik.
Are there other explanations for why Jews have such disproportionate power over media
I could go over the book "Immigration And Culture" with you, but you'd have to be willing to listen. Disparity does not equal Discrimination.
Nice how you just cut out the "of course" there so you can continue your self-righteous tirade.
For example, he has never called me a gender traitor, a secret woman subverter, working on behalf of the femoid cabal, or just straight up a woman.
I've done no such thing either, but you reply as if I have. Curious.
Nice how you just cut out the "of course" there so you can continue your self-righteous tirade.
This is exactly my fucking point though. Do you actually give a shit about discussing an answer, or would you like continue to spout memes about Jews. It's one or the other. If it's the former, what do you want to go over. If it's the later, don't expect me to not throw some shit back in the other direction.
Think of it no differently than ibdemic coming on with some Orange Man Bad shit.
I've done no such thing either, but you reply as if I have. Curious.
I didn't say that you did, it's that the antisemetic right does incessantly. TheImpossible1 at least has the ability to contain himself by comparison.
Most of it's because we're all tired of the same fucking schtick forever. We get it, you think it's the Jews and nothing ever else because you believe in no other concept of power dynamics beyond eternal race war and you're upset because you think the Jews are winning and the whites are loosing.
We got the fucking message, and you're still wrong.
The part after this is where someone calls me a jew for disagreeing.
No I don't think it's the jews and absolutely nothing else. I just find it interesting how the discussion is a mind killer for people here.
Hmmm there's clearly a coordinated push that's racially and politically motivated to disenfranchise conservatives, whites, patriots, etc. But the second you mention that a disproportionate amount of people pushing this are the same ethnicity, which also happens to have its own ethnostate already, suddenly its some vast conspiracy? And you can't talk about it anymore?
Like Elon Musk asking "who controls the media" meaning just the rich, but every journo immediately took it as an antisemitic attack. Real interesting
Are there other explanations for why Jews have such disproportionate power over media and why it's used to attack whites? Of course, but shrieking like a harpy and insulting people for pointing out cohencidences only drives people further into believing that. You're not changing their minds by shrieking "REEEEEE STORMFAG! THE JEWS DO NOTHING WRONG!" Especially when you're shrieking at the wrong target.
I'm here for open discussion of any and every possibility no matter how distasteful. I only see Tony sperging out at Impossibro for replacing the jews in stormfag thinking with women; when really if you want to be ideologically consistent, you should be too. As well as anyone else who shits themselves at the mention of Judaism. But no, the shrieking only comes out when it's specifically jews mentioned.
That's like saying someone is being closed minded when don't want to put their hand on a hot stove. No one's being "closed minded" to you and other's like you ranting about the Jews. It's the same shit it always has been, it's always wrong, and it always results in someone explaining why Hitler was a good boy who dindu nuffin and was just on his way to college, and he totally wasn't a Leftist. ... so in the end you still end up promoting racial justice, leftism, and the balkanization of the country.
If you were so ideologically inclined to cover the issue, and not just another person literally blaming the jews for their life not being together.
You might as well claim I'm a sex traitor who's not recognizing the pattern of women's cabal against men when TheImpossible1 starts up.
I could go over the book "Immigration And Culture" with you, but you'd have to be willing to listen. Disparity does not equal Discrimination.
White Leftism, like many European ideologies including Catholocism, builds off of shame. Some people can be shamed into obedience. It's a collectivist mindset that continental Europe has had for a very long time.
Only because they are promoting self-victimization in order for them to feel like they need the protection of white racialists, like all other ones.
Nothing's going to change their minds until they change their emotion about the thing. This is the same issue that I have with Holocaust Denial. It's purely motivated reasoning. I shouldn't have to explain to a Holocaust "skeptic" that there was more than one death camp, or that the Germans stopped shooting people in favor of gas trucks. But, that's the level of ignorance tied to an emotion that happens with every conversation about the Holocaust. If it were emotionless, it would be a useful, but fairly academic discussion.
But it's not, because the argument isn't really "The facts of different issues within the Holocaust are up for debate." The argument is: "The jews lied to me."
And it goes the same way every time. It's always the Jews fault, it's always about how the world is defined solely along racial tribalism, it's always that the Jews are uniquely the most dangerous and subversive race, it's always that there's an evil about them genetically, and it always ends with White Socialism is the only way for progress.
No, the racialism has to get confronted early and often when it's getting pushed early and often. It's no fucking different from going to a Leftist sub, talking about a police shooting, and some asshole saying, "If he was black, he would have been killed. Did you know police are slave patrols?"
It's Leftist subversion and there needs to be a response to it. But how many times to I have to explain that the police aren't slave patrols until they stop? Never. It's not based in reality, it's based in emotion.
If they want to act like an individual and listen to honest dialogue, then fine, show it to me. Apotheosis (a Christian Identity user) has. He'll rationalize his position until the cows come home, and he'll defend White Christian National Socialism and claim the Jews are innately satanic. But once I get past his first level of posturing for the crowd (because that's what his first comment will always be about), he can still have a discussion.
For the most part, it's just him fucking ranting. I'd rather play with him a bit so he mellows out over time and realizes he can't blame women for all of his problems. It's just him, and there's not an active political push by fringe Incels to squat on boards and be particularly vile to users who disagree with them.
For example, he has never called me a gender traitor, a secret woman subverter, working on behalf of the femoid cabal, or just straight up a woman.
TheImpossible1 has the capacity for humor, and he doesn't have dozens of people prepared to jump in and rant with him, creating a hysterical environment of paranoid woman-haters.
yeah the germans tooled around all day in modified trucks that have never been found, spending valuable wartime fuel suffocating millions. kinda like when that rowdy tour group who pulled pranks at the capitol earlier this year was actually a deadly insurrection possibly worse than 9/11. it's history and i believe it as we're supposed to
Gas trucks which have been photographed and were originally invented by the Soviets.
That and you might think that executing all of Europe's Jews is a waste of resources, but that's your own fault for not understanding a) Socialism, b) National Socialism, c) Hitler's idea that he was literally trying to save Europe from the Jews.
When socialists decide that something is important, they sacrifice their resources to it. They have planned economies for a reason, and accept the problems that come with it to achieve those issues. Hitler believed that if he didn't eradicate the Jews from Europe entirely, then they would utterly destroy Europe until there was nothing left. Not only did they use fuel, they used men, they used ammunition, they used policing forces, they used railway cars and time, damn near up to the very end of the war because they believed what they were doing was of monumental importance and a heroic good for the world.
You'll notice that Stalin also had no problems purging his own military during active military campaigns, and also massacred thousands of Polish officers at Khatyn despite the fact that he could have absorbed them into the Soviet Army.
Fucking tilting at windmills mate. I've been very clear that I'm not a stormfag but you go off full speed as if I was one. This is what I meant by mindkilling. You see someone mention early life or say "cohencidence" (which I just think is a hilarious portmanteau that really has no use outside of these discussions)
But yeah, just cut context out of my reply so you can keep tilting at that windmill Don Gizortnik.
Nice how you just cut out the "of course" there so you can continue your self-righteous tirade.
I've done no such thing either, but you reply as if I have. Curious.
This is exactly my fucking point though. Do you actually give a shit about discussing an answer, or would you like continue to spout memes about Jews. It's one or the other. If it's the former, what do you want to go over. If it's the later, don't expect me to not throw some shit back in the other direction.
Think of it no differently than ibdemic coming on with some Orange Man Bad shit.
I didn't say that you did, it's that the antisemetic right does incessantly. TheImpossible1 at least has the ability to contain himself by comparison.
They still did Operation Harvest Festival that was a (little known) large scale machine gun action in 1943.
Sure, it's not like they're gonna say, "No, never use guns".