Good thing divorce settlements are not based on 'deserts', but on a division of assets. Frankly, I don't think it should be 50/50 when one side cheats. The side that cheats should be punished more.
If I was in charge of divorce, I'd change the law entirely.
Maximum settlement : 1 year's salary at the average wage. Nothing more.
You can tell that the commie fucks aren't real commies and are women's puppets by the fact that they never, ever attack the richest women, who are nearly all there from either divorce or inheritance and have achieved zero.
If I was in charge of divorce, I'd change the law entirely.
Shocker of the century there.
Maximum settlement : 1 year's salary at the average wage. Nothing more.
So a woman who supports her husband for 20 years in building a business, puts up with everything, who then cheats, gets nothing. Nice.
Note that this is about principles, not about whether this vile creature or Bezos's wife deserves anything.
You can tell that the commie fucks aren't real commies and are women's puppets by the fact that they never, ever attack the richest women, who are nearly all there from either divorce or inheritance and have achieved zero.
They never attack richest men who are on their side either. Attacking George Soros is anti-Semitic. Attacking non-Jewish billionaires is also anti-Semitic. But attacking Sheldon Adelson was good and noble.
She got 20 years of living way above her means, that isn't worthless. If it wasn't for him, she'd be a garbage tier "author" who probably works at Starbucks.
I'm aware of that, but the fact that most female billionaires are literally the embodiment of the parasitism that they're supposedly against and they say nothing says a lot.
She got 20 years of living way above her means, that isn't worthless
It's less than worthless, because if you spend your time working at home, you are not developing job skills that will allow you to get higher pay. Instead, you're working for the upkeep of a man who then turns around and cheats on you.
I'm aware of that, but the fact that most female billionaires are literally the embodiment of the parasitism that they're supposedly against and they say nothing says a lot.
What madness gave you the impression that they are against billionaires?
Dude, you don't know what went on in the context of that relationship. For all you know, she gave him ample reason to cheat. Of course, this might be difficult
for you to comprehend, because as you are a flawless diamond of reason, you'd obviously never have a moment of human weakness.
I don't give a shit about the Bezos family, their business is their business. I'm happy to say that I don't know what happened and I don't know who deserved what in terms of retribution. Anyone outside of the situation claiming otherwise is just a pious gossip-spreading asshole.
Good thing divorce settlements are not based on 'deserts', but on a division of assets. Frankly, I don't think it should be 50/50 when one side cheats. The side that cheats should be punished more.
If I was in charge of divorce, I'd change the law entirely.
Maximum settlement : 1 year's salary at the average wage. Nothing more.
You can tell that the commie fucks aren't real commies and are women's puppets by the fact that they never, ever attack the richest women, who are nearly all there from either divorce or inheritance and have achieved zero.
Shocker of the century there.
So a woman who supports her husband for 20 years in building a business, puts up with everything, who then cheats, gets nothing. Nice.
Note that this is about principles, not about whether this vile creature or Bezos's wife deserves anything.
They never attack richest men who are on their side either. Attacking George Soros is anti-Semitic. Attacking non-Jewish billionaires is also anti-Semitic. But attacking Sheldon Adelson was good and noble.
I know, shocking.
She got 20 years of living way above her means, that isn't worthless. If it wasn't for him, she'd be a garbage tier "author" who probably works at Starbucks.
I'm aware of that, but the fact that most female billionaires are literally the embodiment of the parasitism that they're supposedly against and they say nothing says a lot.
It's less than worthless, because if you spend your time working at home, you are not developing job skills that will allow you to get higher pay. Instead, you're working for the upkeep of a man who then turns around and cheats on you.
What madness gave you the impression that they are against billionaires?
Dude, you don't know what went on in the context of that relationship. For all you know, she gave him ample reason to cheat. Of course, this might be difficult for you to comprehend, because as you are a flawless diamond of reason, you'd obviously never have a moment of human weakness.
I don't give a shit about the Bezos family, their business is their business. I'm happy to say that I don't know what happened and I don't know who deserved what in terms of retribution. Anyone outside of the situation claiming otherwise is just a pious gossip-spreading asshole.
Anything that takes longer than 5 seconds isn't a moment.
Correct, you don't know. So until it is established that she did something wrong, he did something wrong and she did not.
Neither do I. But I do believe that people who cheat should be punished.
White knighting for a freaking censorship-loving billionaire? Incredible.