She got 20 years of living way above her means, that isn't worthless. If it wasn't for him, she'd be a garbage tier "author" who probably works at Starbucks.
I'm aware of that, but the fact that most female billionaires are literally the embodiment of the parasitism that they're supposedly against and they say nothing says a lot.
She got 20 years of living way above her means, that isn't worthless
It's less than worthless, because if you spend your time working at home, you are not developing job skills that will allow you to get higher pay. Instead, you're working for the upkeep of a man who then turns around and cheats on you.
I'm aware of that, but the fact that most female billionaires are literally the embodiment of the parasitism that they're supposedly against and they say nothing says a lot.
What madness gave you the impression that they are against billionaires?
She would never have those skills, her entire life, all she achieved was writing God-awful books under a pseudonym. Are you really suggesting Bezos was holding her back? It's because of him that she isn't a barista like every other failed writer wannabe.
That's literally the point of communism, steal from the "undeserving rich" and give to themselves. The idea is that the rich are forced to forfeit their assets so that the only powerful people in that world are Party members. Of course, the Party is always incredibly corrupt and the utopia falls apart quicker than a feminist's arguments that their ideology isn't based on hatred.
I just find it funny that with all the tirades against landlords, business owners, investors and everyone else they hate, they've never addressed the most parasitic way to get money - divorce settlements.
Are you really suggesting Bezos was holding her back?
Bezos is human trash. But anyone who spends her time on the upkeep of a household will develop less human capital. So it's only fair that Bezos pay for his disgusting behavior.
That's literally the point of communism, steal from the "undeserving rich" and give to themselves.
Well, they are neoliberals. They are in league with the rich. Hard to believe that you hadn't realized this so far.
they've never addressed the most parasitic way to get money - divorce settlements.
I know, shocking.
She got 20 years of living way above her means, that isn't worthless. If it wasn't for him, she'd be a garbage tier "author" who probably works at Starbucks.
I'm aware of that, but the fact that most female billionaires are literally the embodiment of the parasitism that they're supposedly against and they say nothing says a lot.
It's less than worthless, because if you spend your time working at home, you are not developing job skills that will allow you to get higher pay. Instead, you're working for the upkeep of a man who then turns around and cheats on you.
What madness gave you the impression that they are against billionaires?
She would never have those skills, her entire life, all she achieved was writing God-awful books under a pseudonym. Are you really suggesting Bezos was holding her back? It's because of him that she isn't a barista like every other failed writer wannabe.
That's literally the point of communism, steal from the "undeserving rich" and give to themselves. The idea is that the rich are forced to forfeit their assets so that the only powerful people in that world are Party members. Of course, the Party is always incredibly corrupt and the utopia falls apart quicker than a feminist's arguments that their ideology isn't based on hatred.
I just find it funny that with all the tirades against landlords, business owners, investors and everyone else they hate, they've never addressed the most parasitic way to get money - divorce settlements.
Bezos is human trash. But anyone who spends her time on the upkeep of a household will develop less human capital. So it's only fair that Bezos pay for his disgusting behavior.
Well, they are neoliberals. They are in league with the rich. Hard to believe that you hadn't realized this so far.
Depends on the divorce settlement.