A lot of people think legal scholars are people who strictly adhere to the constitution, when they actually exist to manipulate the law and constitution, which is why many are test case lawyers.
You gotta admit, they did a phenomenal job sneaking in. This stuff's been going on for decades and only within the last 6-8 years did it suddenly appear everywhere from online to in the public schools.
The right was playing checkers while the left was playing 3-D chess
In both cases, the appellate judges basically said: "Kill yourself".
Don't be surprised if an appeal gets made and Chauvin's attorney is literally told that by the judge who arrests him for Contempt of Court by filing the appeal in the first place.
Won't be contempt. As stated above, he is guaranteed a appeal at this point. More likely that they just give it a skim and rubber stamp it rather than do the right thing. Hopefully it is not the case, but I think they want him to be their scapegoat and he is going to be screwed.
Who's going to grant an appeal? The judge who denied the defense's motion for a mistrial? Who denied the motion to sequester? Who said he trusts the media? Who trusts the jury they wouldn't watch any news? Right.
None of this will stick on appeal.
We'll see. You have no idea the extent to which the judiciary is infiltrated by leftists.
Coincidentally, one of the first critical race theory writers (as in, came up with it, started codified it, etc) is a legal scholar.
A lot of people think legal scholars are people who strictly adhere to the constitution, when they actually exist to manipulate the law and constitution, which is why many are test case lawyers.
You gotta admit, they did a phenomenal job sneaking in. This stuff's been going on for decades and only within the last 6-8 years did it suddenly appear everywhere from online to in the public schools.
The right was playing checkers while the left was playing 3-D chess
Donald Trump and Count Dankula say "Hello".
In both cases, the appellate judges basically said: "Kill yourself".
Don't be surprised if an appeal gets made and Chauvin's attorney is literally told that by the judge who arrests him for Contempt of Court by filing the appeal in the first place.
Won't be contempt. As stated above, he is guaranteed a appeal at this point. More likely that they just give it a skim and rubber stamp it rather than do the right thing. Hopefully it is not the case, but I think they want him to be their scapegoat and he is going to be screwed.
Who's going to grant an appeal? The judge who denied the defense's motion for a mistrial? Who denied the motion to sequester? Who said he trusts the media? Who trusts the jury they wouldn't watch any news? Right.
He is guaranteed an appeal at this point to the State Appellate Court by law.
It absolutely will. I see some of you still do not know how real power works. I suppose a second demonstration may convince you?