I saw KIA linked on the All Communities sidebar and from the most recent posts assumed it was dead, then I happened to notice a few KIA2 posts on communities.win and apparently this one is active.
Sorry if this has been discussed to death already. I just got here.
Wasn't it a great idea for the half mods to allow leftists in and gimp GG from week 1 with their "don't attack the opposition, fight a defensive battle" and "boycotts and emails are a bad idea guyz! it's what the other side does!" concern trolling. Jim will eternally be right about GG.
I mean nearly all the mods were Leftists themselves, so it makes sense why they would want to go easy on the opposition (aka former allies) because if they went hard they would have to admit that Leftism was the common theme and corrupting agent.
But GG was the closest this "culture war" ever got to an actual strike back, so it was still worth riding the wave. Which says alot about how limp dick the resistance has been to all this.
This is not true though. I don't understand why people insist that censorship must be interconnected with politics. Their problem is their arrogance and their control-freak nature, not their politics.
Because most of them were very open about their political leanings, acted similarly to those with the same leanings we were in opposition to, and eventually began to use their leanings to define reality to us when enforcing those rules (remember T_D crossposters are all brigaders, SJW are unrelated to Gamegate, and journalists literally getting beaten has nothing to do with ethics in journalism because Rarara didn't like the politics of it? I do).
Politics don't exist in a bubble, they are intertwined with our attitudes, personality and beliefs. That's how we create our politics to begin with and adapt them to the world as we age.
We all agree of the inevitable consequences of communism because of its politics and those who hold them, so why is it so hard to see Leftism has inevitable consequences because of politics and those who hold them?
So elaborate. Which ones, and what did they say that constituted 'openness about their political leanings'?
It's not inevitable. But if it were, that would not show that people who censor are necessarily on the left.
Oh, I know. I still remember the shit show that happened when someone started linking sjw ideology to the left and Frankfurt school. First sign that the sub was going to quickly either go full lefty or split.
That was disallowed by the admins. As soon as the mods discovered that it was allowed (because I sent the admins a message about something completely different and then told them about the response), they allowed it again.
Why were you having to do their work for them?
From what I have heard, that is because they simply don't reply to 'our kind'.
The reason they did reply to me, is because I asked about a completely unrelated matter where people were contacting advertisers.
When it was being discussed, prior to the Admins being liars, there were several dozen newer "member" who were instantly against it.
Speaking of which, why don't we do those here? They seemed to be highly effective.
Good question. There's a LOT of blackpilled bedwetters here though.