Eh, no. You were wrong twice just in the past 24 hours.
I usually go too sadistic for their plans and too lenient when it's against them.
It's not necessarily the 'sadism' that you are wrong about, but about capabilities. A fundamental tenet of realism is that one does not consider intentions, but capabilities.
I'm not even willing to consider that possibility. She will not go down. Women have gotten away with far more obvious killings.
Nice excuse. So if you think it is such an impossibility, then clearly your assumptions are flawed at best if you turn out to be wrong again. But I'm sure you'll just make up some BS excuse again, as you did here contrary to your vow just one hour ago that you would admit that you were wrong. "THEEEEY will get the governor to pardon her within 3 months." or "it's just an attempt to get black votes so THEEEY can kill me".
Though I cannot hold a candle to your great creativity.
Her name will be forgotten as soon as they get something else to talk about
You still haven't explained how that would be any different from all the other sacred characters they stopped talking about when they got someone else.
and her case will be quietly dropped
ROFL. OK, so after claiming that she would not be named nor her picture published, about which you were wrong, and claiming that she would not be charged, about which you were wrong, you are now claiming that the prosecution will 'quietly drop' the case.
That will be bet three that you will be wrong about, with two more to go after that.
Their capabilities are limitless.
Yet they haven't managed to kill you, which you claim is what they want.
Eh, no. You were wrong twice just in the past 24 hours.
It's not necessarily the 'sadism' that you are wrong about, but about capabilities. A fundamental tenet of realism is that one does not consider intentions, but capabilities.
Nice excuse. So if you think it is such an impossibility, then clearly your assumptions are flawed at best if you turn out to be wrong again. But I'm sure you'll just make up some BS excuse again, as you did here contrary to your vow just one hour ago that you would admit that you were wrong. "THEEEEY will get the governor to pardon her within 3 months." or "it's just an attempt to get black votes so THEEEY can kill me".
Though I cannot hold a candle to your great creativity.
You still haven't explained how that would be any different from all the other sacred characters they stopped talking about when they got someone else.
ROFL. OK, so after claiming that she would not be named nor her picture published, about which you were wrong, and claiming that she would not be charged, about which you were wrong, you are now claiming that the prosecution will 'quietly drop' the case.
That will be bet three that you will be wrong about, with two more to go after that.
Yet they haven't managed to kill you, which you claim is what they want.
Nah, they're all criminals.
I'm ahead by 2 already, and that's just this case alone. We're disregarding for a moment all your other 'predictions'.
Go right ahead an explain.