So, maybe I was wrong and they are just puppets of a higher power. Maybe they are supposed to be our allies after all.
Maybe it's the Jews who are trying to put a check on male power. The noticers might have been right after all.
So what can we do to stop them? Well, I guess the first thing is to protest. Can anyone think of a date?
We really don’t know what to do at this point. The ruling class have done a good job at hiding themselves. They’ve been setting everyone against each other while pushing their insanity to gain more power. I had hope the pendulum would swing back, but I doubt it now.
Uh, no.
This is not a problem of not knowing what to do, it's a problem of fear, complacency, and a general lack of commitment.
There's nothing more dangerous in the world than men who are committed to trade their lives for an objective, knowing they won't see it.
We don't have that. Broadly speaking the people with the intelligence to formulate a good plan, also stand to be in the upper half of society if they simply do nothing and go galt, so there's really no incentive take action.
Can we both just agree that Jewish women are responsible for the majority of social discohesion pushed in the media, you dirty date noticer?
Quite the claim. Can you substantiate this?
Jewish women have nothing to do with obliterating the foundation of society.
She was only NOW President for 4 years.
Yeah, and Jesus only preached 3 years.
Wow, you found two?
More concerned with the nexus than the noise. Plenty of little hats in the noise as well, but your lying eyes would never convince you, so why would I bother?
The assertion was:
And that was what you decided to show. Pretty easy to prove if it is the case.
So quite a terrible showing on your part.
The impetus of second and third wave feminism were Jewish in nature. Now, these two women didn't act without a firm groundwork of critical theory in place to reject tradition, but these two are at the nexus of the most destructive forces to the family in Western societies.
Do you want me to find their Jewish facilitators? They're there, but it's a lot of research to give you names and connections, and I have no illusion you'd be convinced even if the research was put in front of you.
How about a simpler question? Is antisemitism immoral, and if so, why?
You're going on all sorts of rants that have nothing at all to do with the question at hand, which is this claim:
For all the claims that it's "obvious", people who believe such nonsense find it very difficult to substantiate it.
Anti-semitism is immoral for the same reason as hating any other race is.
Which of your threads do you want me to use?
Oh, wait, how about Joe Biden's statement that Jews are responsible for homosexuality in America?
How about you just prove your claim "that Jewish women are responsible for the majority of social discohesion pushed in the media", you little Stormfag.
Still going with the stormy stuff are ya?
Have you not realized yet that that only makes you look bad?
Well, you're a Stormfag. I can't do anything about it. You're a crazed anti-Semite who asserted that many KiA2 mods are Jews, and then were incapable of saying who.
And here, it's noted that you try to play the victim over being called a Stormfag, because you couldn't prove your claim.
Was not my claim.
Also there's only two of them on .win.
Not crazed. Perfectly reasonable.
Also not antisemitic. I just don't like jews or Judaism. I'm fine with semetic peoples like the Iranians.
Why are you begging me so hard to break the site's/board's rules, Antonio?
I'm pretty sure that what you're doing, which is asking for people to be doxxed, is against the rules itself.
As for stormfaggery, you don't realize at all that you've admitted to reading and following their stuff, right? You're accusing me, a fine, upstanding Ultra Nationalist, of being the errand boy for a fed entrapment scheme that you apparently enjoy perusing.
What was your claim? Certainly not one that you could back up in any way, as you've repeatedly apparently realized that people were on to you.
Iranians are not Semites. Not liking people based on their race is pretty stupid. You are entitled to not like religions.
Oh, is that your excuse for why you can't back up your claims, eh? So making the claim does not break the rules, but providing any sort of evidence does. Interesting.
Methinks you're seeing things again.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_feminists
https://files.catbox.moe/qoo1ry.jpg
Great, you linked a few images. And these people are "responsible for the majority of social discohesion pushed in the media"?
Just sharing a list of Jewish women who pushed feminism. You can ignore it if you want to.
The assertion wasn't "some of the feminists were Jewish", it was that the majority of anti-white nonsense comes from Jewish women.
But by all means, get your hateboner in there.
Of course. ((They)) will ((slip)) on them and ((fall)).
Somebody has no sense of humor.
Or maybe you’re not funny ;)
I Mean I’m Not Saying It’s The Jews , But...
reads user of poster
Thanosimpossiblememe.jpeg
Read the bold text, I haven't lost all my brain cells yet.
UGH.
You remind me of this guy, carefully explaining how mainland China is "surprisingly capitalist," since you don't have a right to social services in, say, Beijing, unless you live there, but housing is very expensive. (The funny bit is, he explains how he finally realized how he was programmed in school to be a Democrat. I won't tell him how far he has to go; I'd be worried he'd give up.)
Orwell's phrase, "oligarchical collectivism," has a lot more to do with America's current economic system than classical Liberalism. The Left tried to push "Progressivism" once "Communism" proved too poisonous, then they dropped it after they smeared it with eugenics and other radical politics, and called themselves "liberals" to cover up their crimes. They poisoned that word enough that Hillary went back to "Progressivism" for 2016, then Biden abandoned even that for a "conservative," old-style Democrat veneer.
"Capitalism" was a word made up by Marx, probably from the French word for "the feeling of being well-capitalized," capitalisme. (Of course he named it after fee-fees.) But no one in 19th C. America or Britain would have called themselves "capitalists."
Another fee-fee smear word is "individualism." (Almost anything ending in -ism is capable of being used as a content-free smear.) Given the lust for collectivism on the Left, I'm not surprised none of them seem worried about surrendering their minds to the government, that "name for those things we all do together." Obviously, it's a matter of degree, but if America was anything before the New Deal, it was "familyist": if you were dead broke, the usual first option was to send you back to your family for them to put you back on your feet.
Read the bold text.
How about: it "wasn't" either.
It's individuals in all groups.