I was thinking the same. All of them are variations on the same theme of "hacking" the human body in a way that has never been tried before on this scale.

OK, a "traditional vaccine" ("live attenuated") could be viewed, perhaps, as a "hacking" of the human body, but it is introducing an external stimulus identical too/very very similar to an actual infection, whereas these other "vaccines" are attempting to deliver instructions to our cells. To say that we understand how our cells work well enough to speak the language of our cells fluently to our cells... that is sophistry. We do not know enough to do this, in my view, and not suffer unintended consequences.