After an incident where anti-loli false flaggots got an account wrongfully banned for cp, ottman decided to ban loli by making false arguments similar to what 8chan owner jim watkins and gab owner andrew torba made.
Minds userbase is having none of it, and are actively calling ottman out for lying while demanding this decision be reversed.
new edit: ottman is having a meltdown, calling people bots and deleting posts.
edit: the mods need to consider banning the anti-loli spergs on this site for pointless infighting.
Reminder that it is not at all unreasonable to assume that every single anti-loli complainer is a pedophile. Not just because it makes perfect sense, but because of mountains of evidence.
I just stumbled on here from an outside link, and I'm starting to think the same thing. I'm not a fan of loli but I've never thought of "real" kids when I saw it. I assume people who like anime porn have a particular fetish - like furries. Generally loli fans wouldn't like CP, furries aren't into bestiality. In reverse, pedophiles and dog-fuckers might be into loli/furry art because they see everything through a sick lens, but it's probably not as satisfying as the real thing to them.
Can confirm, I'm into petite women and dislike big breasts. If I was to "translate" what I see when I look at loli art (obviously not the stuff that looks like a kid, I just find that cute, and find it kind of weird when it's sexual), the best description would be just... petite women with cute faces.
I also don't give a single solitary shit if some pedo looks at it and sees a kid, if anything, I'm glad - that means they can live their life without victimising anyone, at least.