Don't they simply use the part of the definition that says only oppressed people can have the viewpoint to appreciate both the lived experiences of the oppressed and the oppressor?
I can't remember the specifics, but I do recall noticing at the time that it was yet another mechanic by which you can label people who disagree with you untermensch and completely disregard even their humanity, in the name of diversity, inclusion and equity.
Yes. But it's worth pointing out to people who can be reasoned with who might otherwise think these people are operating in good faith.
It reminds me of the whole "safe space" bullshit several years back. They actually renamed them "brave spaces" when hated groups pointed out they they were being attacked despite it being supposedly not being allowed. Of course, the faggots, trannies, and niggers who outranked them were never expected to be "brave", even under their fucked up definition of the term.
As you said, and as I've said in the past it's all about designating certain groups as Untermenschen.
Another article not worth reading. I just think it's worth pointing out that the experts political hacks that tell us we should accept "lived experiences" without question no matter how retarded or obviously dishonest are the same ones who deny them when they don't lend support to their ugly agenda. The guy was clearly fucked up in the head and out to kill anyone he blamed for his sex addiction, Asian or not. But no, it must be waysism because our betters need this incident to fuel their moral panic so they can control us even more.
In line with Blue, searching yields very sporadic results, but there are plenty of crumbs the 50 cent army haven't swept up so you'll occasionally see it behind scandals such as Fang Fang and Eric Swalwell, Georgia courting Chinese investment directly, media defending China beyond the limits of merely a devil's advocate.
"Experts" is a label used by the lying media to whitewash its own bad ideas.
Then they're just dumbfounded that no one listens to "experts" any more. It's a shock I tell you! A shock!
Don't they simply use the part of the definition that says only oppressed people can have the viewpoint to appreciate both the lived experiences of the oppressed and the oppressor?
I can't remember the specifics, but I do recall noticing at the time that it was yet another mechanic by which you can label people who disagree with you untermensch and completely disregard even their humanity, in the name of diversity, inclusion and equity.
Yes. But it's worth pointing out to people who can be reasoned with who might otherwise think these people are operating in good faith.
It reminds me of the whole "safe space" bullshit several years back. They actually renamed them "brave spaces" when hated groups pointed out they they were being attacked despite it being supposedly not being allowed. Of course, the faggots, trannies, and niggers who outranked them were never expected to be "brave", even under their fucked up definition of the term.
As you said, and as I've said in the past it's all about designating certain groups as Untermenschen.
A white person killing a minority for any reason is a hate crime.
A non-white person killing a white person is not a hate crime regardless of the facts.
Conclusion: white lives are literally less protected than non-white lives.
But they're Black so they can't be racist (also heard Indians saying this)
Another article not worth reading. I just think it's worth pointing out that the
expertspolitical hacks that tell us we should accept "lived experiences" without question no matter how retarded or obviously dishonest are the same ones who deny them when they don't lend support to their ugly agenda. The guy was clearly fucked up in the head and out to kill anyone he blamed for his sex addiction, Asian or not. But no, it must be waysism because our betters need this incident to fuel their moral panic so they can control us even more.The way the press is circling the wagons on calling it racism makes me think these happy jack shacks are part of China's BGY blackmail strategy.
BGY?
Coined or discovered by the Whistle-Blower Movement.
In line with Blue, searching yields very sporadic results, but there are plenty of crumbs the 50 cent army haven't swept up so you'll occasionally see it behind scandals such as Fang Fang and Eric Swalwell, Georgia courting Chinese investment directly, media defending China beyond the limits of merely a devil's advocate.