Pronoun military wahmen threatens Tucker Carlson
(archive.is)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Other comments by her:
link - archive.org - archive.today
link - archive.org - archive.today
link - archive.org - archive.today
And it's supposed to be any wonder why America loses every war...
Hopefully also to the MPs/JAG. The UCMJ must have something to say on this
UCMJ: hides The Antifa Handbook and Saul Alinsky texts Ahem, she didnu nuffin.
If America loses wars, it's only by setting themselves unattainable standards for victory. Crushing your enemy and overthrowing their government in days with 10:1 kill ratios would be considered victory in any other war, and even that's America going easy on them. They could literally have won the war in Afghanistan in 30 minutes with zero casualties while achieving their strategic objectives.
Plus, that's an incorrect-ass statement.
The US' win to loss ratio on conflicts is weighted very heavily towards the W's.
The current "War on Terror", if they're even calling it that any longer, is a deliberately ceaseless quagmire that exists only to fill the coffers of those in the Military-Industrial Complex and their adjacent beneficiaries.
Victory was never an intended outcome.
Crushing a bunch of goatherds with jamming AK-47s isn't exactly something to brag about though. The Soviet Union managed to overthrow the Afghan government as well, but never managed to stay and win.
Why stay? We don't want Afghanistan, we just wanted the Taliban dead.
Afghanistan kills empires. The moment we got embroiled in that goatrope of a region, we were screwed.
I hope China fucks around over there soon enough; it'd be funny.
That sounds like some fan fiction stuff.
Let's see if the military gave her a working tank, instead of a toy one.
It's a woman so expect her to get it stuck in a ditch and have to call one of her (male) comrads to come pull her out.
So, what I've learned is that women have zero qualms about literal war crimes if the target is a "misogynist" while our side refuses to even hurt their fee fees.