Yeah, they'll say "Oh they don't actually care about this ideology, they're just doing it for the money!" while major companies and governments burn cash at an unprecedented rate to instill out-group biases in advertising and education.
It's about class. All this came about because of Occupy Wall Street. Rich get scared and want to distract all these people. It then shifts to social justice, and all these people who wanted to eat the rich are now fully on their side.
I don't get this logic. The elite prep schools are embracing Wokeness and destroying what makes them elite. They are eliminating merit-based admissions, and programs for gifted students because of "equity."
They are polluting their STEM education by making them all about "ethnic studies." They are removing the classics from literature and replacing it with Woke garbage.
Nobody who comes out of these schools is going to know jack shit other than how to jockey for victimhood status and maybe organize a protest.
It looks to me like the elites are committing seppuku via virtue signaling, and leading the West's suicide charge off of a cliff.
If I recall correctly, she was a Women's March supporter who defended it even when the anti-Semitism stuff came out. But she has become increasingly woke on SJWs as their outrages have increased.
Elite prep schools probably didn’t care until the parents wanted a way to virtue signal about how virtuous they are sending their kids to learn about how “evil” they are.
Kinda, yeah, but it is a bit of an odd example to bring up in this context; it disproves his claim outright, but dipping into women-worsting supports female privilege being significant nonetheless.
I guess it may be confusing, but I was taking a shot simultaneously at him and at the "25% of homeless are women" victim nonsense.
Though in my opinion, you cannot measure privilege solely by outcomes, because one is ex ante and one is ex post. For example, the Chinese in Malaysia do better than Malays despite being disadvantaged, because of their culture and hard work. Whether that is true for women and homelessness is to be debated, but that's the point, it cannot be assumed either way.
Communist whines that people are ignoring their class warfare, news at 11.
Yeah, they'll say "Oh they don't actually care about this ideology, they're just doing it for the money!" while major companies and governments burn cash at an unprecedented rate to instill out-group biases in advertising and education.
It's definitely about class. They don't hate rich white people (that's where they get their opinions), only the 'deplorables'.
"They're not after me. I'm just in the way."
It's about class. All this came about because of Occupy Wall Street. Rich get scared and want to distract all these people. It then shifts to social justice, and all these people who wanted to eat the rich are now fully on their side.
I don't get this logic. The elite prep schools are embracing Wokeness and destroying what makes them elite. They are eliminating merit-based admissions, and programs for gifted students because of "equity."
They are polluting their STEM education by making them all about "ethnic studies." They are removing the classics from literature and replacing it with Woke garbage.
Nobody who comes out of these schools is going to know jack shit other than how to jockey for victimhood status and maybe organize a protest.
It looks to me like the elites are committing seppuku via virtue signaling, and leading the West's suicide charge off of a cliff.
What makes them elite is their reputation. Nothing more. Which is why Harvard can reject people based on their race, while suffering no cost at all.
They're basically tickets to the ruling class. It doesn't matter if you are incompetent.
Let's hope so. Our only salvation is for the elites to commit seppu-ku.
If I recall correctly, she was a Women's March supporter who defended it even when the anti-Semitism stuff came out. But she has become increasingly woke on SJWs as their outrages have increased.
Feminists don't ever change, they only obscure their true selves.
Elite prep schools probably didn’t care until the parents wanted a way to virtue signal about how virtuous they are sending their kids to learn about how “evil” they are.
Actually...the people saying focus on race are your kind, because even economic privilege pales in comparison to female privilege.
Not going to lie, you seem like a pretty unpopular guy around here.
It's very hit or miss. Sometimes everyone agrees with me.
I've seen some stuff where I'm like "wasn't this guy on the sites most-wanted list"
Not even sure what that means, haha.
You're either getting 50 upvotes or in the negatives lol.
Sounds about right.
Then I hope those 25% of homeless who are wahmen apologize to Bill Gates for oppressing him.
Most of them are addicts and mental cases.
So you may persuade them yet.
Women literally created "white privilege" to distract from female privilege.
You can say my theories of a lot of things are based on a 6 degrees of a woman game, but this one is 100% true.
I'm not particularly interested in you claiming that you can read the minds of the morons who made up 'white privilege'.
What I like far better is that you claim, effectively, that homeless women are better off than Bill Gates.
I was actually thinking more the average woman is better off than the average upper-class man.
As has been demonstrated so many times across MeToo BS, family courts and politics.
The average woman is not involved in MeToo BS, family courts or politics.
But she is at much greater risk of rape and sexual assault, and doesn't have the physical strength to fight anyone off.
What are the other 75%, Antonio?
Men, of course.
I hope it was obvious what I was mocking.
Kinda, yeah, but it is a bit of an odd example to bring up in this context; it disproves his claim outright, but dipping into women-worsting supports female privilege being significant nonetheless.
I guess it may be confusing, but I was taking a shot simultaneously at him and at the "25% of homeless are women" victim nonsense.
Though in my opinion, you cannot measure privilege solely by outcomes, because one is ex ante and one is ex post. For example, the Chinese in Malaysia do better than Malays despite being disadvantaged, because of their culture and hard work. Whether that is true for women and homelessness is to be debated, but that's the point, it cannot be assumed either way.