What does "amplifying narratives that undermined faith in NATO" actually mean?
Is NATO above criticism, or are we putting the misinformation tag on anything globalists do not agree with?
Even if they are Russian, if what they say is true then is it not the responsibility of NATO to gain back the lost trust?
How did we end up in the point where criticism of huge institution is seen as a bad thing?
I have the same thing with the China Virus, ok there is misinformation out there but the reason why so many of us are skeptical is the censoring of information rather then properly debate it, we are in a point were we can't criticize "Science" when "Science" is contradicting itself every month. Not to mention the very manipulated statistics that you are not allowed to question.
Is it not the solution more dialogue rather then less?
P.S. I'm capitalizing S in Science now since it has a dogmatic sense for the left and I do not want to offend the retards
To enhance your imagery with a relevant meme, we're digging straight down in Minecraft. Will we hit a cave? Will we hit lava? Will we hit bedrock? Place your bets!
What does "amplifying narratives that undermined faith in NATO" actually mean? Is NATO above criticism, or are we putting the misinformation tag on anything globalists do not agree with?
Even if they are Russian, if what they say is true then is it not the responsibility of NATO to gain back the lost trust?
How did we end up in the point where criticism of huge institution is seen as a bad thing?
I have the same thing with the China Virus, ok there is misinformation out there but the reason why so many of us are skeptical is the censoring of information rather then properly debate it, we are in a point were we can't criticize "Science" when "Science" is contradicting itself every month. Not to mention the very manipulated statistics that you are not allowed to question.
Is it not the solution more dialogue rather then less?
P.S. I'm capitalizing S in Science now since it has a dogmatic sense for the left and I do not want to offend the retards
Calling spade a spade and having the audacity to say that things are not 100% alright.
Because allowing it to diminish in influence would send a message that globalism is not the way.
More "useful" dialogue that keeps the big thing going until the public perception changes to viewing it as best solution.
Less "useless" dialogue that puts doubt in collectivism.
To enhance your imagery with a relevant meme, we're digging straight down in Minecraft. Will we hit a cave? Will we hit lava? Will we hit bedrock? Place your bets!
I've got five dollars on "we keep digging forever and never hit anything because this is purgatory".
I have heard that called "Scientism", if you wish make a more obvious distinction.