There’s no conspiracy with modern advertising, honest!
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (64)
sorted by:
At least it’s a white guy this time.
Awkwardly enough, doesn't that usually point to the black woman actually being decent? Considering no self-respecting man of ANY ethnicity (not even black) would put themselves anywhere near a relationship with a woman that fits the stereotype?
To get a little more specific, I recall a mixed relationship chart basically saying white man/black woman was NEAR NONEXISTENT. And basically no ethnicity other than black man had interest, though they also had quite the white woman lean at the same time. So basically, no one wants to date black women, and if a white man does, they are either the most pathetic men around, or they hit a fucking jackpot of an amazing human being.
Near non-existent, but if a WM/BF pair forms, it usually lasts. It is one of the lowest divorce rates of any interracial pair.
Doesn't this kinda go against the white ethnonationalist argument that mixed race couples and the dilution of social identity causes social unrest then?
If WM/BF creates the lowest divorce rates, even lower than WM/WF and healthy stable marriages then isn't that something you want to promote?
Only problem is more likely than not those babies are going to be born with an identity crisis and more suceptible to far left wing stupidity... so I guess maybe not that route then.
Not really. The offspring often struggle with identity issues later in life.
The stability of the marriage comes from the woman knowing that a good white man is the best mate she can get and has absolutely no desire to ever trade down, so she sticks by him.
Thats just the issue, because social pressure will hit them from both sides and neither is pleasant. There are two ways of dealing with this: pick a side, or retreat into the family unit. Unfortunately, the latter is less possible thanks to a variety of socioeconomic factors, such as two earner households, distance between immediate amd extended family, and societal pressure to conform to the new orthodoxy.
WMBF is such a ridiculously low number of pairs you can't draw a lot of information from it because low sample size makes it hard to judge more factors around it.
We know BMWF is very volatile because many of them start based on drug deals or "getting back at daddy" reasons, rather than anything inherent to the pair itself.