I’ve heard from a few sources today that the FBI even came out and said that the attack was planned ahead of time, and had nothing to do with Trump’s rally. And the timeline doesn’t match up, anyway, as was reported earlier. The attack began before Trump was even finished speaking.
I saw a "fact check" about this "There is no evidence that antifa led riot" or something like that. The easiest way to lie is to take true thing that opponents are saying, tweak it just enough to be technically untrue and then deboonk that instead.
The fact checkers claimed that a woman who was literally sent to prison for a terrorist bombing wasn't necessarily a terrorist because no one can agree on the definition of terrorism. Anyone who quotes a fact checker is an idiot.
They decide what makes evidence. Anonymous hearsay (e.g. "the whistleblower") in their favor is damning evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Video evidence of a crime that goes against them? No grounds for evidence and not admissible.
I’ve heard from a few sources today that the FBI even came out and said that the attack was planned ahead of time, and had nothing to do with Trump’s rally. And the timeline doesn’t match up, anyway, as was reported earlier. The attack began before Trump was even finished speaking.
Oops...that second, rushed impeachment looks mighty stupid now.
Like facts would ever get in the way of Democrats trying to slander and impeach Trump.
The mainstream media here will never walk back the insane "coup" accusations they leveled against Trump.
"Black Lives Matter Activist Who Stormed Capitol on Jan. 6 Charged"
He apparently tried to blend in with MAGA protesters https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/1349867391405223937
Antifa tried to incite arson https://justthenews.com/nation/crime/fbi-agent-says-progressive-activist-was-participating-capitol-riot?amp
I saw a "fact check" about this "There is no evidence that antifa led riot" or something like that. The easiest way to lie is to take true thing that opponents are saying, tweak it just enough to be technically untrue and then deboonk that instead.
The fact checkers claimed that a woman who was literally sent to prison for a terrorist bombing wasn't necessarily a terrorist because no one can agree on the definition of terrorism. Anyone who quotes a fact checker is an idiot.
Fuck the corrupt leftist fact checkers.
We have proof now that Antifa members, BLM members and CNN employees themselves were at this event trying to incite protesters to commit violence.
She's a freelancer, not an employee.
They decide what makes evidence. Anonymous hearsay (e.g. "the whistleblower") in their favor is damning evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. Video evidence of a crime that goes against them? No grounds for evidence and not admissible.
By the way it gets worse. CNN was also in on instigating the event.
https://mobile.twitter.com/amuse/status/1349885882262761473
I'm not sure how much this actually matters. He may have instigated but others followed and the narrative has already been woven.