What an utterly disingenuous statistic. I find it incredibly difficult to believe that some people genuinely think it's "the most serious human rights issue of our time", or that abortion results in a person being killed.
If you really, genuinely believe it, then fair enough I guess, I can somewhat respect your well-intentioned (but misguided) anger, but every time I see shit like this, my first thought is that the journalist is being a total piece of shit by deceptively framing this in a way to mislead and anger people.
I find it incredibly difficult to believe that some people genuinely think it's "the most serious human rights issue of our time", or that abortion results in a person being killed.
People used to bomb abortion clinics and kill doctors who performed them: that is behavior consistent with a genuine belief it is "the most serious human rights issue of our time".
Prolife people believe the fetus is a living being. Thereby abortion is literally mass scale genocide in their world view.
In what sense is that not a massive human rights issue? It only doesn't seem like it because you've removed the prerequisite and then assumed everyone is malicious when they follow through on it logically.
I think we can probably find a common ground compromise from most people on what constitutes "it is now alive" based on brain, heart, growth or some single criteria.
Unfortunately pro-abortion people aren't interested in compromise or logic. They just want to fucking get that baby out and no amount of morality or decency seems to matter. They refuse to even see the opposite point of view and react with emotion (as seen above) to the idea of opposition.
I'm very much pro-abortion, and it should definitely be illegal somewhere between the start and the end of the second trimester. Third should never be legal.
What an utterly disingenuous statistic. I find it incredibly difficult to believe that some people genuinely think it's "the most serious human rights issue of our time", or that abortion results in a person being killed.
If you really, genuinely believe it, then fair enough I guess, I can somewhat respect your well-intentioned (but misguided) anger, but every time I see shit like this, my first thought is that the journalist is being a total piece of shit by deceptively framing this in a way to mislead and anger people.
You've not really explained your points at all. How's it disingenuous of the journo? Does an abortion not terminate what is/would be a human life?
People used to bomb abortion clinics and kill doctors who performed them: that is behavior consistent with a genuine belief it is "the most serious human rights issue of our time".
Prolife people believe the fetus is a living being. Thereby abortion is literally mass scale genocide in their world view.
In what sense is that not a massive human rights issue? It only doesn't seem like it because you've removed the prerequisite and then assumed everyone is malicious when they follow through on it logically.
I think we can probably find a common ground compromise from most people on what constitutes "it is now alive" based on brain, heart, growth or some single criteria.
Unfortunately pro-abortion people aren't interested in compromise or logic. They just want to fucking get that baby out and no amount of morality or decency seems to matter. They refuse to even see the opposite point of view and react with emotion (as seen above) to the idea of opposition.
I'm very much pro-abortion, and it should definitely be illegal somewhere between the start and the end of the second trimester. Third should never be legal.
You're thinking of progressives.
OK antifa, but what do we do about the Dukes and Kings.
Statistics are not disingenuous. Numbers are not good or evil. Numbers do not lie.
The taking of an unborn life is murder.
People should be angry when they see these numbers. They should be angry at the people who commit and enable the murder of the unborn.
Well, they defined men as less than human forever ago. This was comparatively easy.