Now do literally anywhere non-Islamic and see who gets the short end of the stick.
You can't dedicate all your political activism to dehumanizing the people you don't like then cry about being mistreated elsewhere. It really just is a case of them being mad that they aren't the ones doing the oppressing.
You don't think that historically, women were once genuinely oppressed? Or that women in some cultures and some parts of the world today still are? Good lord.
You think this makes someone 'Nazi trash'?
Well, I've got bad news for ya. I would not call it 'oppression', but it must have felt that way to the people who were at the receiving end of societal necessity.
Saying that kind of thing while being a UK resident makes you Nazi trash.
Because this lady being a UK resident means that women are not oppressed in Islamic countries?
Oh, and in the UK as well. Rotherham.
She could literally kill me and get away with it under current laws.
Can you suspend your incessant victim-playing for just one moment and address the relevant issues?
And if women in the UK can literally kill men and get away with it, doesn't it mean that nearly all women are pretty great for not doing that? After all, it means that even though they are not punished for murder, while men are, they still commit far fewer murders than men. Our better halves indeed.
I addressed this argument. If a group is frequently involved in stripping the human rights of others, is removing their representation in the halls of power a bad thing? Is it really unjust to not allow them power, or is it just something they claim because they aren't the people doing it to us?
Don't link me propagandist Nazi trash from my former home country.
Women were oppressed by husbands and children. Now that women are rejecting both, they are sooo much happier. Just ask them.
Women were/are oppressed by the following :
men having human rights (See the Trump Title IX circus)
men doing the bad jobs and letting them stay at home (tradcuckery)
men not doing the bad jobs and leaving them for women (wage gap)
men earning for their household (representation in high-level positions)
getting those positions themselves (people expect too much of us!1!)
men dying in wars for them (protection cliché)
men not dying for them (White feather movement)
men wanting sex (toxic masculinity)
men not wanting sex ("MGTOW are losers lol")
men helping them (mansplaining)
men not helping them (MentorHer)
If you can't tell, the only thing that doesn't seem to make them mad in some way is when men suffer.
Now do Saudi Arabia.
Now do the UK.
Now do Spain.
Now so Sweden.
Now do literally anywhere non-Islamic and see who gets the short end of the stick.
You can't dedicate all your political activism to dehumanizing the people you don't like then cry about being mistreated elsewhere. It really just is a case of them being mad that they aren't the ones doing the oppressing.
You think this makes someone 'Nazi trash'?
Well, I've got bad news for ya. I would not call it 'oppression', but it must have felt that way to the people who were at the receiving end of societal necessity.
Saying that kind of thing while being a UK resident makes you Nazi trash. She could literally kill me and get away with it under current laws.
Because this lady being a UK resident means that women are not oppressed in Islamic countries?
Oh, and in the UK as well. Rotherham.
Can you suspend your incessant victim-playing for just one moment and address the relevant issues?
And if women in the UK can literally kill men and get away with it, doesn't it mean that nearly all women are pretty great for not doing that? After all, it means that even though they are not punished for murder, while men are, they still commit far fewer murders than men. Our better halves indeed.
I addressed this argument. If a group is frequently involved in stripping the human rights of others, is removing their representation in the halls of power a bad thing? Is it really unjust to not allow them power, or is it just something they claim because they aren't the people doing it to us?
It's very relevant, and it's not victim playing.