You don't think that historically, women were once genuinely oppressed? Or that women in some cultures and some parts of the world today still are? Good lord.
You think this makes someone 'Nazi trash'?
Well, I've got bad news for ya. I would not call it 'oppression', but it must have felt that way to the people who were at the receiving end of societal necessity.
Saying that kind of thing while being a UK resident makes you Nazi trash.
Because this lady being a UK resident means that women are not oppressed in Islamic countries?
Oh, and in the UK as well. Rotherham.
She could literally kill me and get away with it under current laws.
Can you suspend your incessant victim-playing for just one moment and address the relevant issues?
And if women in the UK can literally kill men and get away with it, doesn't it mean that nearly all women are pretty great for not doing that? After all, it means that even though they are not punished for murder, while men are, they still commit far fewer murders than men. Our better halves indeed.
If a group is frequently involved in stripping the human rights of others, is removing their representation in the halls of power a bad thing?
This sounds like a feminazi argument for turning the tables and oppressing men as retaliation for the alleged oppression men have doled out in 250,000 years of human history...
As usual, like feminists, you can only think in collectives.
And this in no way addresses the claim of whether women are oppressed in Islamic countries and in Rotherham.
It's very relevant, and it's not victim playing.
Nah, it is victim-playing, which you do in 100% of your comments. One would think that you are posting from the basement of 10 women who are holding you as a sex slave or something, the way you talk.
And you did not address that if your claim that women are not punished for murder, they would be our better halves...
You think this makes someone 'Nazi trash'?
Well, I've got bad news for ya. I would not call it 'oppression', but it must have felt that way to the people who were at the receiving end of societal necessity.
Because this lady being a UK resident means that women are not oppressed in Islamic countries?
Oh, and in the UK as well. Rotherham.
Can you suspend your incessant victim-playing for just one moment and address the relevant issues?
And if women in the UK can literally kill men and get away with it, doesn't it mean that nearly all women are pretty great for not doing that? After all, it means that even though they are not punished for murder, while men are, they still commit far fewer murders than men. Our better halves indeed.
This sounds like a feminazi argument for turning the tables and oppressing men as retaliation for the alleged oppression men have doled out in 250,000 years of human history...
As usual, like feminists, you can only think in collectives.
And this in no way addresses the claim of whether women are oppressed in Islamic countries and in Rotherham.
Nah, it is victim-playing, which you do in 100% of your comments. One would think that you are posting from the basement of 10 women who are holding you as a sex slave or something, the way you talk.
And you did not address that if your claim that women are not punished for murder, they would be our better halves...