If a group is frequently involved in stripping the human rights of others, is removing their representation in the halls of power a bad thing?
This sounds like a feminazi argument for turning the tables and oppressing men as retaliation for the alleged oppression men have doled out in 250,000 years of human history...
As usual, like feminists, you can only think in collectives.
And this in no way addresses the claim of whether women are oppressed in Islamic countries and in Rotherham.
It's very relevant, and it's not victim playing.
Nah, it is victim-playing, which you do in 100% of your comments. One would think that you are posting from the basement of 10 women who are holding you as a sex slave or something, the way you talk.
And you did not address that if your claim that women are not punished for murder, they would be our better halves...
But their narrative is based on outright fiction. Mine is based on their actual actions and their near constant claims of being oppressed by others having human rights.
Really, women were not oppressed in the past either? Something tells me that if you're not happy with how men are treated now, you would not be happy if you were in that position. And by your logic, that mistreatment shows that men cannot be trusted with power and that they must not have any.
See how stupid this collectivism is? Of course not.
Also, if you're wondering why Boris Johnson is so useless, it's because his wife is actually ruling the country and has been since he caught China Flu.
Yah, can't be that Alexander du Pfeffer Johnson is actually Eton elitist scum.
I still have at least some of my free will, even if they're slowly taking over every country to try and remove it from me.
You're not a victim, stop playing one. You haven't suffered 1/1000 of what the girls in Rotherham suffered.
I made a post that ripped apart their constant attempts to get their hands on power after being rejected by the electorate there and it got Rule 16'd.
Good, cause it sounds completely retarded, as usual. Just imagine thinking that half the human population is a hivemind, or that Theresa May got crushed not because she is a worthless idiot, but because she is a woman...
And they haven't suffered even a millionth of what Mr. Vigliarolo did at the hands of the Women's March guest speaker. It's not a competition, but if it was, they'd lose.
So more women murder men than men who murder women?
This sounds like a feminazi argument for turning the tables and oppressing men as retaliation for the alleged oppression men have doled out in 250,000 years of human history...
As usual, like feminists, you can only think in collectives.
And this in no way addresses the claim of whether women are oppressed in Islamic countries and in Rotherham.
Nah, it is victim-playing, which you do in 100% of your comments. One would think that you are posting from the basement of 10 women who are holding you as a sex slave or something, the way you talk.
And you did not address that if your claim that women are not punished for murder, they would be our better halves...
Really, women were not oppressed in the past either? Something tells me that if you're not happy with how men are treated now, you would not be happy if you were in that position. And by your logic, that mistreatment shows that men cannot be trusted with power and that they must not have any.
See how stupid this collectivism is? Of course not.
Yah, can't be that Alexander du Pfeffer Johnson is actually Eton elitist scum.
You're not a victim, stop playing one. You haven't suffered 1/1000 of what the girls in Rotherham suffered.
Show me.
Good, cause it sounds completely retarded, as usual. Just imagine thinking that half the human population is a hivemind, or that Theresa May got crushed not because she is a worthless idiot, but because she is a woman...
So more women murder men than men who murder women?