Saying that kind of thing while being a UK resident makes you Nazi trash.
Because this lady being a UK resident means that women are not oppressed in Islamic countries?
Oh, and in the UK as well. Rotherham.
She could literally kill me and get away with it under current laws.
Can you suspend your incessant victim-playing for just one moment and address the relevant issues?
And if women in the UK can literally kill men and get away with it, doesn't it mean that nearly all women are pretty great for not doing that? After all, it means that even though they are not punished for murder, while men are, they still commit far fewer murders than men. Our better halves indeed.
I addressed this argument. If a group is frequently involved in stripping the human rights of others, is removing their representation in the halls of power a bad thing? Is it really unjust to not allow them power, or is it just something they claim because they aren't the people doing it to us?
If a group is frequently involved in stripping the human rights of others, is removing their representation in the halls of power a bad thing?
This sounds like a feminazi argument for turning the tables and oppressing men as retaliation for the alleged oppression men have doled out in 250,000 years of human history...
As usual, like feminists, you can only think in collectives.
And this in no way addresses the claim of whether women are oppressed in Islamic countries and in Rotherham.
It's very relevant, and it's not victim playing.
Nah, it is victim-playing, which you do in 100% of your comments. One would think that you are posting from the basement of 10 women who are holding you as a sex slave or something, the way you talk.
And you did not address that if your claim that women are not punished for murder, they would be our better halves...
But their narrative is based on outright fiction. Mine is based on their actual actions and their near constant claims of being oppressed by others having human rights.
Also, if you're wondering why Boris Johnson is so useless, it's because his wife is actually ruling the country and has been since he caught China Flu. Can't get away from female rulers, even if they vote them out.
Who leads Rotherham again? Oh, right, the party of the great Jess Phillips. Their problem, their people.
locked in a basement as a sex slave
That's some people's fantasy. But no, I'm definitely not. I still have at least some of my free will, even if they're slowly taking over every country to try and remove it from me.
But their narrative is based on outright fiction. Mine is based on their actual actions and their near constant claims of being oppressed by others having human rights.
Really, women were not oppressed in the past either? Something tells me that if you're not happy with how men are treated now, you would not be happy if you were in that position. And by your logic, that mistreatment shows that men cannot be trusted with power and that they must not have any.
See how stupid this collectivism is? Of course not.
Also, if you're wondering why Boris Johnson is so useless, it's because his wife is actually ruling the country and has been since he caught China Flu.
Yah, can't be that Alexander du Pfeffer Johnson is actually Eton elitist scum.
I still have at least some of my free will, even if they're slowly taking over every country to try and remove it from me.
You're not a victim, stop playing one. You haven't suffered 1/1000 of what the girls in Rotherham suffered.
Because this lady being a UK resident means that women are not oppressed in Islamic countries?
Oh, and in the UK as well. Rotherham.
Can you suspend your incessant victim-playing for just one moment and address the relevant issues?
And if women in the UK can literally kill men and get away with it, doesn't it mean that nearly all women are pretty great for not doing that? After all, it means that even though they are not punished for murder, while men are, they still commit far fewer murders than men. Our better halves indeed.
I addressed this argument. If a group is frequently involved in stripping the human rights of others, is removing their representation in the halls of power a bad thing? Is it really unjust to not allow them power, or is it just something they claim because they aren't the people doing it to us?
It's very relevant, and it's not victim playing.
This sounds like a feminazi argument for turning the tables and oppressing men as retaliation for the alleged oppression men have doled out in 250,000 years of human history...
As usual, like feminists, you can only think in collectives.
And this in no way addresses the claim of whether women are oppressed in Islamic countries and in Rotherham.
Nah, it is victim-playing, which you do in 100% of your comments. One would think that you are posting from the basement of 10 women who are holding you as a sex slave or something, the way you talk.
And you did not address that if your claim that women are not punished for murder, they would be our better halves...
But their narrative is based on outright fiction. Mine is based on their actual actions and their near constant claims of being oppressed by others having human rights.
Also, if you're wondering why Boris Johnson is so useless, it's because his wife is actually ruling the country and has been since he caught China Flu. Can't get away from female rulers, even if they vote them out.
Who leads Rotherham again? Oh, right, the party of the great Jess Phillips. Their problem, their people.
That's some people's fantasy. But no, I'm definitely not. I still have at least some of my free will, even if they're slowly taking over every country to try and remove it from me.
Kamala Harris was never legitimately elected.
Really, women were not oppressed in the past either? Something tells me that if you're not happy with how men are treated now, you would not be happy if you were in that position. And by your logic, that mistreatment shows that men cannot be trusted with power and that they must not have any.
See how stupid this collectivism is? Of course not.
Yah, can't be that Alexander du Pfeffer Johnson is actually Eton elitist scum.
You're not a victim, stop playing one. You haven't suffered 1/1000 of what the girls in Rotherham suffered.