I'm inclined to agree. There needs to be some kind of unambiguous rule for determining when a company no longer qualifies for protection. I can only assume such a rule does not exist, because the sites I named previously have been exceedingly blatant in their biased treatment of their users.

I simply disagree with the idea of destroying it completely. I'm willing to accept that destroying it and writing a new, better worded law with the same intent may be the only way. I'm simply not completely convinced that destroying it is necessary right now.