https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u1Z3WTaisA&ab_channel=DracoLordNick67
Pedo elites trying to scapegoat drawings "cause loli" meanwhile they create the movie "Cuties". Its always projection and trying to attack Japan. .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u1Z3WTaisA&ab_channel=DracoLordNick67
Pedo elites trying to scapegoat drawings "cause loli" meanwhile they create the movie "Cuties". Its always projection and trying to attack Japan. .
I doubt that there are any studies that even attempt to untangle why Cuties was created. Why every social media platform is gaining MAP presence.
Does shota turn people into pedos? No. But it normalizes pedophilia, and empowers people who are, to bring their sickness into the rest of society. It degrades the self-defense mechanism that society has against pedos.
I can't think of any research organization on the planet, with the sheer horse power necessary to study that scale of effect. I don't care what studies you have - they aren't the right kind of studies.
im not talking about Cuties did you not bother looking at the things i said. ? Cuties and MAPs are completely wrong cause those are real with real victims, but im talking about drawings.
And i was complaining that the same people who would defend Cuties would go and attack drawings . Is it they'd rather hurt real kids so they scapegoat and attack harmless drawings? There are so many examples of those who attack drawings for being "pedo" but then turn out to be the actual real life pedo happens so often its honestly a meme at this point. Is it to have people waste time and resources on useless things like attacking drawings so they dont deal with any actual issues and actual pedos. ?
And there is studies that's proven drawings doesn't make people do any real crime any more than violent video games does and if anything it has the opposite effect. Saying it "normalizes pedophilia" is as stupid as saying violent video games "normalizes violence". Censoring harmless art in anyway is wrong and will always end up with censoring more and more.
( And you can't say "its not the right kind of studies" just cause the results is something you dont personally like. At that point you are just thinking with emotions instead of facts or your head)
I know you're talking about drawings. I'm saying that the proliferation of pedo drawings is responsible for the change in people's attitudes, that allowed some people to make Cuties without anyone stopping them.
Does drawing pedo art turn people into pedos? Probably not. Does it cause closet pedos to start offending? Probably not.
Does the awareness of its popularity and acceptance embolden offending and otherwise dangerous pedos? Yes, I think it does. That is my problem with it.
Sex is not the same thing as violence. Bad argument. Yawn.
Nor is pedo art a game. There is no performant aspect of being attracted to children. There is nothing in pedo art other than the partial actualization of a degenerate impulse.
People play games to play, and to win. People create, share, and consume, pedo material, to be pedo as much as they can. There is no comparison between the two at all. And you know that.
Of course your know that.
I'm with you.