https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u1Z3WTaisA&ab_channel=DracoLordNick67
Pedo elites trying to scapegoat drawings "cause loli" meanwhile they create the movie "Cuties". Its always projection and trying to attack Japan. .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u1Z3WTaisA&ab_channel=DracoLordNick67
Pedo elites trying to scapegoat drawings "cause loli" meanwhile they create the movie "Cuties". Its always projection and trying to attack Japan. .
I know you're talking about drawings. I'm saying that the proliferation of pedo drawings is responsible for the change in people's attitudes, that allowed some people to make Cuties without anyone stopping them.
Does drawing pedo art turn people into pedos? Probably not. Does it cause closet pedos to start offending? Probably not.
Does the awareness of its popularity and acceptance embolden offending and otherwise dangerous pedos? Yes, I think it does. That is my problem with it.
Sex is not the same thing as violence. Bad argument. Yawn.
Nor is pedo art a game. There is no performant aspect of being attracted to children. There is nothing in pedo art other than the partial actualization of a degenerate impulse.
People play games to play, and to win. People create, share, and consume, pedo material, to be pedo as much as they can. There is no comparison between the two at all. And you know that.
Of course your know that.
I'm not making the comparison you're making. That's what you don't get. These two subjects are not similar.
And, to be fair, I agree with your last statement. I didn't qualify that I just want to see every platform, publisher, creator, worker, etc, I interact with, not to have anything to do with it. It's only a moderate distinction, and I didn't think it would matter to your kind, so I didn't bother. But I'm not saying there should be criminal charges. I did leave that out.