Recently got a temp ban from KiA2 for very mildly acknowledging this fact. Just testing the waters here.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (142)
sorted by:
Usually because such a stance lacks the balls to acknowledge what is necessary to restore those traditions, namely taking women's rights away.
These 'rights' should be taken insofar as they are not actual rights, but invented ones. But by acknowledging them as rights, you assert that by taking them away you are doing something wrong.
Good insight on the framing of the issue. I presume you're referring to the concept of natural rights??
Fuck you, I don't need Islam.
No, I fully acknowledge that people would consider that necessary, but I have a counter point.
If you have to take everything from them and basically put them in chains to make them treat others like human beings - why on earth would you bother?
Just stop them fucking up society and leave them to their own devices other than that, writing their genocidal screeds on Twitter.
We should have the technology to not be bound to them by now. I'm not talking about sex bots, I'm talking about artificial wombs. Then all the tradcucks can have their kid and we don't have to hear about how women are important ever again.
Nothing strikes more fear in the hearts of female supremacists than men co-operating across divisions to make their purpose obsolete.
The tradcuck's good women argument is the greatest weapon of the female supremacist.
Abandoning nature is how we got into this pickle, why would you think that doubling down on that path would yield anything other than disaster?
Why is it that you are bothered by 'genocidal screeds on Twitter', when far fewer women kill men than vice versa?
Children need a father and a mother. Not an 'artificial womb'.