They're concerned about 'bias' because it makes accurate predictions when they haven't corrupted the AI with their ideology. For example, when AI accurately predicts that blacks are more likely to re-offend than whites.
Or that white men make up the majority of high profile scientists. If you Google physicist you get half random women in front of a chalkboard like stock photos and Einstein. Same with biologist, ceo, scientist, physician, athlete, etc. All stock looking photos of diversity. Yet if you Google philosopher you get numerous statues of ancient greeks. Odd how that works.
They're concerned about 'bias' because it makes accurate predictions when they haven't corrupted the AI with their ideology. For example, when AI accurately predicts that blacks are more likely to re-offend than whites.
Or that white men make up the majority of high profile scientists. If you Google physicist you get half random women in front of a chalkboard like stock photos and Einstein. Same with biologist, ceo, scientist, physician, athlete, etc. All stock looking photos of diversity. Yet if you Google philosopher you get numerous statues of ancient greeks. Odd how that works.
Better yet: search for 'white couples' and see what you get.
Here's Google's explanation. https://twitter.com/dannysullivan/status/1080728184935538689
I want to believe them...
Remember when they used to actually be about technology?
Memba when there was non-political news?
oh yeah, never
have a grinnin barrett
ofc ai programmed by tech bros is misogynist
✨Misogyny isn't real✨
there's no such thing as a "tech bro"