Justice is dead.
(archive.is)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
When I first joined this place because i hadn't touched gamergate in a while, and never really engaged with the community, I was kind of appalled by your views on women.
Over time, however, I have come to respect your conclusions. I don't think (and never will) that "women" is a single homogeneous group and act together to gain more power or whatever, but I have become a bit cynical in the classical sense about women; I no longer accept "societal norms" pertaining to them. Individual women tend to be power hungry whores willing to do absolutely anything to get ahead, including subversion even of their own movements and other individual women. They are like cannibals in that regard.
They are irrational, manipulative, controlling, and sly and will do everything in their power to twist your mind until you're doing things for them without question you would have vomited at the thought of even just a year ago. Then once you've been financially and emotionally drained, they leave you to rot a profoundly broken man.
Exceptions exist, notably my own wife. She's a wonderful human being and our son is very happy indeed. That's all that they are, though. Exceptions. Women in general are almost exclusively self-interested. Most of them would be Amber Heard if they were more self-confident.
Women are like teenagers. Mostly adults, but full of weaknesses, hormones, and general madness that cause them to act in ridiculous ways. Much like teenagers still, with extremely proper parenting AND social circles (plus a chunk of luck from hereditary) they can be downright pleasant and good things instead of rebellious monsters.
And yet, like teenagers still, "falling in with a bad crowd" can undo all of it and that wonderful exception returns from college for Xmas break a whole new monster.
Point of this is, exceptions are made (and rarely born), but they are still women at heart. Capable of the same failings and one must never grow too comfortable in that regard. You can live a long and happy life with her never failing you as such, but that growing comfort is often how that path to ruin starts.
*For the record, this isn't an attack on you or your wife. Much happiness to your family. Only a perspective on how everyone thinks theirs is the exception and many end up wrong for it because of that thought, man or woman (how many think they are with the one super hot muscle tat guy who isn't a violent felon in the making?). A mistake I made and only with luck didn't end up ruined for it.
My issue is that we haven't really come up with good feedback mechanisms to deal with bad female behavior. If two men come to a disagreement, there's a pretty well-established way to deal with it, up to and including physical violence if the situation escalates that far. You don't really have a comparable mechanism for women.
Of course not all men get into a situation where it comes to blows, just as not all women get into that same situation; but the point is that it never happens, even in situations where it would if the person were a man. And the only solution the left is able to come up with is "under no situation ought a disagreement result in physical violence", which only works provided everyone agrees to that and no-one defects. And after the year we've had, anyone who believes no one would defect is a fool.
I would say that in general is one of the fundamental issues with modern liberal society: everyone has equal rights, but not everyone has equal responsibilities. Liberal society depends on that to function, but our "liberals" have spent decades trying to argue how certain people ought to be exempted from having equal responsibilities.
Funny thing is, we used to have them. Then discrimination and social ostracization were engineered to become a bad thing.
Make ostracism normal again.