Again, that's your personal bias blocking you from understanding what is being said.

Its not some "weird purity spiral." Its understanding how foot in the door works, and how precedent in rule enforcement works. Earlier this year a giant titty short anime girl in a barely lewd SoL show was considered "pedophilia" because we let these people run amok. Austrailia considers girls with tits too small pedophilia legally no matter their age. That's what happens when you let these "weird crusades" go on unchecked, more absurd shit happens.

But that doesn't mean every site has to have porn and it doesn't mean that every site that has porn has to include all types of it.

You have porn or you don't. That's a rule. Any other distinction beyond strict legal ones (beast, cannibal, rape, etc.) is moral enforcement and has no place in rules at any point ever if you want to be considered seriously.

And before you argue it, loli stuff was held up as free speech by the SCOTUS so it isn't illegal federally and the Protect Act of 2003 has gone unchecked by it which is the only vague law against it.

Nobody would have cared if gab didn't allow porn. But the guy in charge took a personal, moral stance against lolishit while still pretending to be a free speech crusader. That's where this particular fight evolved from.