Nepal has been long time ago already conquered by a Maoist (and feminist: https://www.nepalitimes.com/review/nepals-maoist-revolution-from-the-inside/) armed revolution.
China can potentially do a while lot with their drones. Including the militarized Chinese commercial little drones as they're being famously used by Ukraine with videos every day.
It's also a future of terrorism.
He doesn't even like them anymore, and always openly hated the fandom, just no one cares about his Hussite Trilogy.
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16ZXQkXc9L/x/c/4TohZsRV2C9
Apparently gave an objective review, quite surprisingly.
PPE also quote GamesRadar and The Verge.
Computer trannyslated back to angielski:
On Polygon, however, you'll read that the story offers "a textureless world populated by generic archetypes struggling to get from point A to point B because the story wants it to." Here we did not get The Witcher in The Witcher, there is no interesting story, viewers cannot admire the work of the actors, and the special effects again look terrible. To make matters worse, the series is overloaded with weak dialogues.
Polygon were the very "some dudes from America" (jacyś goście z Ameryki) that I think narrative director of Witcher 3 later talked about saying they have criticized their game "for the lack of characters of blackskins" (brak postaci czarnoskórych) while in the game they "only presented this world as described by Sapkowski".
And if there were German (or American) dead fighting alongside the Italians, of course it would be also a German (or American) defeat.
The NVA units were located (LZ Albany on accident), brought into combat
That's a really funny way to describe being ambushed while waiting for helicopters to get them out of there.
That never happened
What else caused Operation Rolling Thunder in your very spinning world?
In the real world, the VC inflcited over 100 losses, destroyed or damaged 25 aircraft (6 bombers destroyed), and lost virtually 0 people (and aircraft, of course) doing this.
The Americans were so smug about the French too, and thought they would be so smart with using helicopters in their in and out adventures and holding no ground like that.
All that was needed was to conquer the major cities of the North and cut off supply from China.
Ans now you're possessed by General MacArthur whose mind is stuck in about the same period, and precisely early 1950. He doesn't know he's dead.
Also,
The US claimed
Yeah, the other side "claimed" wild enemy losses too. You should really know the problems with the Vietnam bodycount by now.
Just admit that you can't find any real battle where the US lost.
That's especially funny since just read about an example of the battle that the Americans lost (and could be been literally all slaughtered but by some miracle that the survivors couldn't explain it just ended before this could happen) but was presented at the time as a ("real") battle won in American propaganda.
"Spin doctors" doing the "spinning", as to quote.
actual battles
There were barely any "actual battles" between forces larger than battalions and regiments due to how this war was fought. Great most engagements for regular GIs involved being fired on by unseen snipers and stepping on mines and traps planted by peasants, and only rarely they could face "the best infantry in the world" (VC Main Force in particular, but also "the NVA are all hardcore" as the song goes) in a unit of any size.
But actually even in Ukraine, where it's a large conventional war, they fight with battalions on both sides. They don't go whole brigades, not to mention divisions, wholesale in contact. Even in Mariupol it was only elements.
No, "only 17" were the absolute elite of American special forces caught in an attack by literally almost naked guys. It doesn't count all the locals who were trained, armed, and led (and clothed) by them and also died in the same attack by those almost naked guys.
Ignore the almost 100 wounded in the FB. After, again, they were attacked by only 50 literally almost naked guys.
I don't include any terrorist/sabotage style bombings (and mine explosions, and just shelling).
And btw the survivor of the Black Lions told you how the Main Force VC were the "best infantry in the world", while their attack special forces (suicide commandos) were the best of their kind in the world too, just the Americans had better and more arty, and of course the air power. Without heavy weapons on either side, the Vietnamese would win absolutely routinely in any large battle.
It wasn't any "corrupt west" that did things like that in the actual "destruction of Yugoslavia" (another one caught, convicted in Serbia and extradited to Croatia): https://balkaninsight.com/2022/07/12/serbia-extradites-vukovar-massacre-convict-to-croatia/
This war isn't publicly controversial in Russia, because the dissent is criminalized. (They can't even call it a war.)
We had no state TV shows where people talked about exterminating Serbia in our "jihad" against "Satan" while smiling.
And being controversial means a plenty of people thought it was unjustified, wrong, and even actually criminal, and spoke about it as such. They were in mass media, they were in politics, and they weren't being jailed for this.
It wasn't Yugoslavia, this country had ceased to exist 8 years prior. It was the new "SFR Yugoslavia", and even this minus Montenegro even before Montenegro formally seceded from Serbia. It was really just this, Serbia and Kosovo. And NATO killed only about 3-4% or so of the civilians who died in the Kosovo war.
And about this massacre, as it happens a suspect was just arrested few days ago: https://balkaninsight.com/2022/12/02/kosovo-police-arrests-suspect-for-dubrava-prison-massacre/
I note you're medically retarded.
There was no "thousands". It was 505 civilians and most of them were Kosovars. In one notorious instance, NATO bombs killed some in prison in Kosovo and then the guards gathered in the courtyard and killed many of the rest with gunfire and grenades from the walls. In all, it wasn't even 1% of civilians killed in the Yugoslav wars that Milosevic all started.
Yes, electricity and heating is important in winter for survival of population.
Stop making retard noises while talking to me, you actual retard.
They didn't "gleefully bombed" and it was always extremely controversial in their (our) countries.
The political leaders who never apologized are Putin's buddies Schroeder and Blair.
Biden: https://youtube.com/watch?v=urspubn1pmw
No retard sounds of yours (a retard), and no "War is hell. It's unfortunate, but it is what you guys asked for. Prostituting yourself to the East has some costs" too.
"Insane woman" for her showing the madness that millions of Russians watch every day?
Biden personally apologized to Serbia years ago. Without making your retard sounds.
"At the beginning" there was winter too.
F is for Fauci
Here's a few more sample "links" of this "easy" war:
https://www.sandboxx.us/blog/attack-on-fob-4-the-worst-day-in-us-army-special-forces-history/
https://donmooreswartales.com/2010/06/28/james-shelton/
https://blog.togetherweserved.com/2021/11/24/fire-base-mary-ann/
I just did link you. They werent "forced to retreat", what was there to hold, a random patch of jungle around a clearing? They were supposed to be obliterated by the B-52s before this even happened, then you mention they escaped to Cambodia.
Why not? Let's say the ARVN Rangers units are fucking massacred, the ARVN Marines reinforcements are massacred even more, the ARVN paratroopers coming to the rescue are massacred somewhat less relatively, their American advisors are killed, multiple American helicopters are shot down, VC losses are something silly like few dozen, and it doesn't count because reasons?
A small group of VC Sappers blows the fuck up half of a major American airbase, but it doesn't matter, because some kind of excuse?
The French were incompetent and bad at fighting, just like WW2. The Americans were far superior and would have easily conquered North Vietnam.
This is what the Americans thought before going to Vietnam too, but even they weren't stupid enough to repeat the same French strategy (taking Hanoi and other cities, which the French did take and held then Hanoi right to the end, and it just didn't matter).
That's hilarious how some Americans can still write "Vietnam" and "easy" in the same sequence.
It was utterly foolish to not invade and conquer North Vietnam
Because it worked for them superbly in North Korea just a decade earlier.
In artworks?
Look at even the women from the Necromunda shithole.
And they still won every battle under those conditions.
I've heard people repeating this and this is still just so false.
Maybe if you redefine "battle" as "large scale unit engagement that was primarily American and not primarily South Vietnamese or other allied, and also we count just our estimated bodycount even if our entire battalion was ambushed and almost all of our guys were killed and wounded before the enemy regiment withdrew after systematically shooting a lot of our wounded" (like at LZ Albany 1965, "won" so much it's officially acknowledged as lost: https://www.army.mil/article/213669/the_tragedy_of_lz_albany_teaching_the_lessons_of_a_battle_lost).
Had the US military been allowed to invade and conquer North Vietnam, it would have done so easily. The vast majority of the North's population was settled on a flat coastal plain that US tanks could have rolled through, all the way to Hanoi. The US could have captured all this area easily. "But muh guerilla warfare", could be totally ignored, because there was no need to go "in the jungle" once the population centers were all taken. The NVA would have its back broken and the communists hiding in the jungle could simply be cut off from supplies from China, and bombed until they starved. Easy.
You must be possessed by a vengeful ghost of a French Union officer.
"born to battle
Nigga Moment
Chechnya also won its 1st war against Russia, not by decisively defeating it on the battlefield, but merely by outlasting the russians and humiliating them with some guerilla warfare.
The Chechens did win on battlefield, in Grozny in August 1996 when they either killed, captured or surrounded thousands of Russian occupation troops while most of the collaborationist police either defected (Paris 1944 / Prague 1945 style) or deserted. https://reliefweb.int/report/russian-federation/chechens-deadly-swagger
(This most certainly also happened in Warsaw 1944, where the cops were forced back to work by Germans on the pain of death, I just don't remember reading about it specifically other then the Polnische Polizei just never being mentioned by anyone, and all police reinforcements being just the German police from the Warthegau annexed territory, with their strange furred backpacks. While the Russians just shot literally all the police officers they captured in 1939, either immediately or in early in 1940 after interrogations.)
This "strange materiał" I mentioned was this, from non-explosive bombs (and so not killing anyone): https://youtube.com/watch?v=QY904Uj859g
Your other commenter mentioned Libya, where they used non-explosive (concrete filled, no warheads) smart bombs to target firing positions and vehicles in civilian areas. "They" here being the French (https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/04/france-dropping-non-explosive-bombs-libya/350160/), with the Americans and the Brits also employing small warhead munitions like the Brimstone missile.
It wasn't in winter, NATO was apologizing to the people of Serbia in their statements and even using non-destructible weapons (and I don't mean EMP, I mean strange physical materials that would disable electricity only until it's cleaned from power lines), wasn't targeting Montenegro, and their countries mass media weren't joyfully gloating over a prospect of mass civilian deaths incoming as Russian state TV does all the time (the official "rescuing oppressed innocent Russian speakers from Nazi genocide" has been replaced with the goal of instead making them starve [there was just a 100th Holodomor anniversary btw], die from diseases, and "drown in shit" for being such not-anymore-Russian speaking cannibal gay Satanists).
India-China DMZ