NATO bombs killed plenty of people, including in the civilian targets that they gleefully bombed.
And the Russian targeting of the power supply has had rather few casualties, so the West is not crying about civilian casualties, but about how wrong it is to do what they themselves did to Yugoslavia and many other countries.
It's bad when they do it! They bad! Our bombs good!
No retard sounds of yours (a retard), and no "War is hell. It's unfortunate, but it is what you guys asked for. Prostituting yourself to the East has some costs" too.
They didn't "gleefully bombed" and it was always extremely controversial in their (our) countries.
Oh, if it being 'controversial' justifies it, then you need to make up your mind about whether the war is controversial in Russia or not.
The political leaders who never apologized are Putin's buddies Schroeder and Blair.
Impressive how you can turn the destruction of Yugoslavia into "Putin bad". Do we then agree that it was bad for the corrupt west to wreck that country?
We had no state TV shows where people talked about exterminating Serbia in our "jihad" against "Satan" while smiling.
And being controversial means a plenty of people thought it was unjustified, wrong, and even actually criminal, and spoke about it as such. They were in mass media, they were in politics, and they weren't being jailed for this.
It wasn't Yugoslavia, this country had ceased to exist 8 years prior. It was the new "SFR Yugoslavia", and even this minus Montenegro even before Montenegro formally seceded from Serbia. It was really just this, Serbia and Kosovo. And NATO killed only about 3-4% or so of the civilians who died in the Kosovo war.
This "strange materiał" I mentioned was this, from non-explosive bombs (and so not killing anyone): https://youtube.com/watch?v=QY904Uj859g
Your other commenter mentioned Libya, where they used non-explosive (concrete filled, no warheads) smart bombs to target firing positions and vehicles in civilian areas. "They" here being the French (https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/04/france-dropping-non-explosive-bombs-libya/350160/), with the Americans and the Brits also employing small warhead munitions like the Brimstone missile.
NATO bombs killed plenty of people, including in the civilian targets that they gleefully bombed.
And the Russian targeting of the power supply has had rather few casualties, so the West is not crying about civilian casualties, but about how wrong it is to do what they themselves did to Yugoslavia and many other countries.
It's bad when they do it! They bad! Our bombs good!
Thank you, me lord, for... sometimes refraining from using non-explosive "smart" bombs in your war of aggression.
They didn't "gleefully bombed" and it was always extremely controversial in their (our) countries.
The political leaders who never apologized are Putin's buddies Schroeder and Blair.
Biden: https://youtube.com/watch?v=urspubn1pmw
No retard sounds of yours (a retard), and no "War is hell. It's unfortunate, but it is what you guys asked for. Prostituting yourself to the East has some costs" too.
Oh, if it being 'controversial' justifies it, then you need to make up your mind about whether the war is controversial in Russia or not.
Impressive how you can turn the destruction of Yugoslavia into "Putin bad". Do we then agree that it was bad for the corrupt west to wreck that country?
We had no state TV shows where people talked about exterminating Serbia in our "jihad" against "Satan" while smiling.
And being controversial means a plenty of people thought it was unjustified, wrong, and even actually criminal, and spoke about it as such. They were in mass media, they were in politics, and they weren't being jailed for this.
It wasn't Yugoslavia, this country had ceased to exist 8 years prior. It was the new "SFR Yugoslavia", and even this minus Montenegro even before Montenegro formally seceded from Serbia. It was really just this, Serbia and Kosovo. And NATO killed only about 3-4% or so of the civilians who died in the Kosovo war.
It wasn't any "corrupt west" that did things like that in the actual "destruction of Yugoslavia" (another one caught, convicted in Serbia and extradited to Croatia): https://balkaninsight.com/2022/07/12/serbia-extradites-vukovar-massacre-convict-to-croatia/
This war isn't publicly controversial in Russia, because the dissent is criminalized. (They can't even call it a war.)