3
ryvrdrgn14 3 points ago +3 / -0

Individual companies will say they recognize it in the Chinese versions of their message. In this instance, someone translated the Hololive post in China and it was very pandering towards the One China policy and had a similar tone to how Blizzard did it. Different messaging for different audiences.

6
ryvrdrgn14 6 points ago +7 / -1

They've been ruining multiple generations of youth through school indoctrination that has been unchecked for decades.

Destroying the family unit, corrupting religion, keeping Americans poor by taking away jobs, higher taxes and inflation gives no time for parents to raise kids properly and make it easier for them to be trained by commie professors, Hollywood and the liberal hate mob.

Humans aren't inherently born wise. Kids are gullible and dumb as fuck due to not having any experience with the world. If left to be programmed by liberals, they can be raised to be even dumber.

12
ryvrdrgn14 12 points ago +13 / -1

Some freshly made account claiming authority as a mod somewhere without giving info is trying to take control of the narrative to make the China hate stop and to make the sheep go back to sleep. I checked the bottom answers and the ones factual about China were mostly downvoted there to keep the "I agree with this post" answers at the top.

13
ryvrdrgn14 13 points ago +14 / -1

The best that people could do in that mess in the Hololive subreddit was inform some people about what China is really about and drop some tips about the 50 cent army, Alinsky and the rules of radicals, and tactics about how people take control of online narratives in politically ignorant communities.

The Taiwan flag post is still in the front page last I checked.

There are still many people there who just cover their ears and go "LALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU I WANT TO GO BACK TO MY HAPPY PLACE"

2
ryvrdrgn14 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mass adoption has been blockchain's problem since it started.

1
ryvrdrgn14 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's always a risk so expect malware that will do this. If there is a "white list" only payment setting then no site gets money unless you explicitly approve it in your account, as long as that can't be manipulated by third parties as well.

Systems that will time-gate your payments so that it's not per click or per visit while you receive notifications of each site you are sending money to can also help reduce the risk.

Nothing is risk free though.

2
ryvrdrgn14 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is an issue that is difficult to solve because it is hard to turn people away from high value. The fact that 1 node isn't equal to 1 person means that capital and other means can always be leveraged to take over a node-based system. Even if it was 1 node per person, technology isn't equal if it's using something like proof-of-work.

6
ryvrdrgn14 6 points ago +6 / -0

Guys like Tim and the Quartering are okay with me, but they are very rambly. I usually watch their videos until they make their point around 5-6 minutes in then after that I usually watch something else.