Why are you refusing the answer the basic premise of the question? Was it too complicated to tease out?
1.) Holocaust. Did any amount of it happen? Any truth to it at all, and if so, what?
2.) Are you asserting some/all the physical evidence is planted? If so, which, in the broadest possible terms?
3.) Why did your definition of normie change? Before it was about repeating what's safe to say. When I point out the lack of safety in defending a nazi psychologist, you ignore that.
4.) You said my thoughts are unoriginal. How often do people compare how black people were groomed into becoming progressives, to how autism is now being groomed into becoming progressives? Is it really that common? I really haven't seen people saying that anywhere else.
I just want to make sure I understand. Are you denying that Germany had programs to exterminate people they found undesirable or unfit to live?
Autistics were on the unfit list. A lot autistic, a little autistic, all of them were sent for evaluation and sent to be killed if found to be autistic. Asperger tried to change that by creating a carve-out. It is not safe, nor is it normie, to defend a "Nazi doctor" that has been disavowed by the world health organization, American government, and American psychological association. Especially when his private correspondence "talked the talk" to maintain his position as a Nazi official.
Are you asserting the allies had time to build dozens of gas chambers and plant bone flecks of thousands of killed and cremated people into the soil around them? With a Germany that had it's infrastructure bombed out and destroyed? All the people needed for a conspiracy such as this have also kept quiet, and destroyed all records, and never divulged the farce? That's what you're asserting?
I don't think a conspiracy of that size could stay secret.
Magic the gathering too. Magic playing kids was one of the OG 90s weird kid hobbies. Now it's an inclusive* safe space with pedo judges. =/
Pokemon has judges that'll disqualify you for being nervous when preferred pronouns are spoken of. Ughh.
*Does not include autistic people. They're "weird" and offend people!
Yeah I agree.
Having a distinctly separate term for it was useful. Sort of like how we don't put manic-depressive in the same bucket as bipolar people. All the psychological body had to do was practice some introspection, watch Schindler's list, and engage their brain for five seconds.
"Oh but aspergers has a level 1 support maximum and many need more than that!"
Yes. If the Nazi government suspected for a moment that the Autistic people would need further support, like level 2 or 3, they would have been gassed. That is why it was baked into the diagnosis as do-not-gas. Now that the Nazi don't exist as a country anymore, it's safe to remove that requirement of the diagnosis and allow it to be all three levels as needed based on the patient.
how happy she was because my dog died
I can't mindread the situation, but I might have said something similar. The meaning behind it would have been something like "You've been upset over it having cancer for so long. Now it's over." thinking. Now if it was something like it got hit by a car... perhaps she was just being a bitch? Autistic people can be mean just like anybody else.
Sadly, the genes run in the family. Sprinkled in examples of an uncle here, a nephew there, myself, a niece. Etc.
I've seen the new/young autistic already get targeted. They're swept up by the teachers from the electives you'd expect. Art teachers, theater teachers, and they get taken in by the herd of "gay" kids they have in the class. Since the autistic are often outcasts, they'll cling to being "gay" or "lesbian" or "enby" too, so they can have a group to belong to. It's sickening to see kids used as cult "love-bomber".
Oh and I'll add that the autistic girls who do exist are being purposely targeted by groomers.
The advocacy website frames this as a good thing. I think it's terrible. There are a lot of autistic girls who mistake their social problems for "being a man in a woman's body" instead of realizing that typical lower hygiene and appearance standards contribute to it more. They'll never get that realization while people lie and groom them.
Trouble is, D can do his best work as Florida governor. That state is the ONLY reason why Republicans can still focus enough on other states to have the ground game needed to win. The state's legislature has not made enough of his edicts into permanent law and if he leaves the seat to become president, a democrat could get in there and reverse everything. Then it'll be democrats forever.
He needs to finish his work where he's at. He's doing a great job... but he's being told he's doing a great job too often. It's going to his head and it is overpowering the sane long game that needs to occur here. Until he's as white haired as Pence, or as leather-bag faced as Trump, he needs to sit tight.
Yeah uh, that doesn't sound funny at all. Druids don't lose their minds when shapeshifted. 100% just "I hate the gay bestiality joke and it should be forbidden!" is what you got going on here.
You get actual humping in normal romance scenes since the days of mass effect and dragon age but this is the bridge too far? It's ESRB mature. If kids are seeing this, they have dogshit parents. Stop squeezing pearls.
You're clutching pearls like a jack thompson. Most of the people here would laugh at parody porn of beast boy going at raven as a dog or a horse, if not outright jack off to it.
You don't see anything. No bear dick. No nuzzle wuzzles your bulgy wulgy uwu. Come off it.
"This 8 year old boy doesn't present with the broken down will and lack of energy that a 40 year old does. We should drug him."
Lazy bitch ass teacher.
Peterson pointed out our school system was modeled after the Prussian model which was designed to make obedient soldiers. Not intelligent people. Not thinkers. I maintain the school system is what is wrong and if I ever had kids, I'd not concede to medicating them for some entitled teacher to have an easier workday.
Give kids back their fucking recess and the ability to talk and play at lunch.
I'm autistic. So I'm going to try to address this from the inside. I'm also old as fuck at this point, so this isn't the zoomer perspective.
Please don't let the tumblrina and your dislike of the tiktok autism face-claimers cause you to treat autistics like shit or scoff at the autistic spectrum. Trust me, we don't like the tiktokers or the tumblrina any more than you do but they still became the face of the movement. It's just like gaming, and how every gaming company is standing up bluehairs and nose ring, gauged ear motherfuckers going on about how great diversity is.
I'm going to explain some things. The surge in autistic diagnosis. The reason why a spectrum is needed for helping autistic people survive. Why autism can be helpful in the gender critical bullshit fight.
Regarding the surge in autism diagnosis.
The impossible1 is going to love this; it is surging because of gynocentrism and a lack of expectations on mothers to put fetus and nursing babies first. Read all this with the following in mind; various pediatric associations reversed their stance on mothers getting drunk because they were concerned about appearing sexist in telling women what to do while pregnant. Fetal alcohol syndrome be damned. Stay through to the end of this section for the real culprit of increased autism and ADHD. Might just save you from having an autistic NEET like me to raise.
Remember thalidomide? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thalidomide_scandal
The mother's medical needs > a baby's safety. That's the attitude in modern society. The standard for pregnancy for literal decades of American medicine was that you didn't give a mother anything if you could avoid giving them medicine. As it almost always impacts the fetus in some way. Or even if the mom was still nursing. As feminism came along, the first wave, this attitude eroded. Despite the warning on almost all medicine remaining in place, for liability reasons, doctors lost this ethic.
Thalidomide is also relevant here because it shows just how overtly a simple medicine can impact a fetus.
Now. Before Tylenol, the only option you really had for any kind of pain relief as a woman during pregnancy was an injection directly into the motherfucking spine. Tylenol came along and it offered women a "safe" medicine they could load up on during pregnancy. Tylenol being a medicine where we have theories about why it works on blocking pain, but nothing we've concretely proven.
You can note, they pretty much admit in the conclusion that the link to autism and ADHD is valid, but they're chicken shits, and they use terms like "pregnant persons" and how they should "consider carefully" on using OTC pain killers. These concerns are valid enough that multiple national and international lawsuits have been launched against people for Tylenol use and Tylenol recommendation... this includes the american military facing a big lawsuit for megadosing pregnant spouses of soldiers and creating a gigantic wave of mental illness among their children. As for why, it was cheaper for the military to megadose moms rather than offer epidurals or let their husbands have leave to tend to the moms.
My mom was one of these moms. I'm an airforce brat. Those lawsuits have survived the initial motions for dismissal. That means that the legal system sees enough evidence to let the trials proceed.
As an afterthought: there is also a rush to diagnose autistic females because the psych community feels really bad and really guilty. They don't want the undiagnosed autistic females to get caught by the trans community and gaslit into double mastectomies. They're trying to make up for a decade of 10-to-1 gender diagnosis rates.
Why the spectrum is needed to help autistics survive.
Most autistic people as a whole are pretty useless. Not counting ADHD here. 85% of all autistics, verbal and nonverbal, and aspergers, are not employed. The 15% that are, 75% of them are employed because of government employment programs such as the government subsidizing a company if it hires autistic people.
This means how much help we need, be it a half-way house or group home, be it a wage subsidy, or a job coach, is highly individual. In order not to waste resources, we needed to be seen and treated as individuals. The government treats most conditions as a one-sized-fits-all go or no-go system of fully disabled or not disabled. The SSDI/SSI programs for example use a "bingo chart" of sorts, and enough things = you don't die homeless.
This takes us to aspergers. The majority of communicative autistic people fall into the aspergers category. This is a category invented by a German doctor in a schindler's list situation. The Nazi were gassing people if they had disabilities that require assistance. To save some small segment of autistic people, those who could talk and reason enough for the doctor to feel sympathy for, they had to convince the Nazi that these people could be useful.
Hence, Asperger invented this new class of autism that was "Bad social fit for life, but still capable of specialized tasks. Therefor, useful. Do not kill."
This was a half-truth. Yes, we could hold basic conversations but we always seemed like the aliens in a skin suit. We set off that creepy uncanny valley alarm. We don't keep jobs very long and instability plagues our life unless we are either a.) self made and our own boss. b.) in a job where performance matters more than if the office ladies like you and feel comfortable around you.
The modern medical community took the diagnosis, wholesale, and said "If you have aspergers, you are functional enough not to require any government support." They never stopped to realize that the no support line was added to the original diagnosis for the literal purpose of preventing our extermination.
We need support, a job coach at the very least, to be part of society... but if the original diagnosis included that, the Nazi would have just killed people like us.
They eliminated Aspergers as a modern diagnosis to shed the "no support" blanket statement. As part of the autistic spectrum, we are now able to be evaluated individually and have our support needs assessed.
Why autism is useful in fighting gender critical bullshit.
Aspergers boys are about as different from drooling retard non-communicative autistics as girl autistics are from boys. They have the same social rejection issues in the end and the transgender community is sweeping up autistic girls and convincing them that they're trans. I've seen estimates that FtMs are something like 6 to 18 times more likely to be autistic.
The autism "spectrum" has to exist because of how differently the mental illness/disorder presents itself in men and women. Without it, so few girls resemble the male default, and thus, would never be diagnosed. Which means, we'd never catch out the predatory people in education.
This is creating a gigantic fuckton of trans regret and detransition. This is also exposing the education and medical sectors as predatory and negligent.
Since women are more able to fight back against this stuff without being ostracized from society, this is far more useful than we give it credit for.
Disney leaks were post skin-suit zombification. That's when two decades of feminist hiring managers got to do their worst. They were also quite clearly lying to investors. They said they bought starwars to expand the Disney appeal to boys. Then turned it into more girl power trash.
Disney is beyond salvaging, but those internal leaks are definitely post-cordyceps.
Jesus fucking christ. I didn't know it went that far.
I guess that creates investment opportunities if you manage your own funds. This absolutely is designed to starve and strangle business the liberals don't approve of. Meanwhile "Bad publicity" doesn't extend to targeting minors with sexual content.
That's the sunk cost issue. If you have already put in a rainbow icon on all your social, prematurely removing that before pride month is up is a risky unknown. However, this year, because budlight happened BEFORE pride month... many of the usual suspects did not put on a pride icon.
I consider that changing. Or at least, reading the room.
I know you're NTA.
I believe there is physical evidence. The body burning process does not burn up the bones. Those had to be ground up with ball bearings in drum grinders. Not only is there photographs of chunky mostly-ground-up bones with pelvis and the like sticking up... there are buried caches of human ash and bone meal around the extermination camps. In fact, a large part of these these were found is because they do respond to metal detectors due to the fact that metal dust and missed ballbearings were often part of what was buried.
If your definition of proof requires you to be able to go there and play around in piles of human bone ash, and desecrate mass graves to satisfy yourself, I think that's unreasonable.
That said my bloodline is German, ashkenazi jew, and autistic. (which ashkenazi jew are disproportionately autistic.)
I had family members that were freed from work camps. According to them, I had other family members that were exterminated for mental illness or died from being worked too hard. There were no benefits at the time to playing that up. Certainly, my bloodline has erred on the side of poverty and the working class. Definitely not part of any secret cabals. No hush money. No victimbux. Do you mean to tell me that we're all carrying on a lie for some reason? I can't think of many reasons why a family would pass down a fictional history.
Also, why the elaborate backstory for the condition of asperger's itself? A ton of fake letters about fake autistic and their fake usefulness? Why useful propagandist or globalist function would that have? Only to delete the diagnosis less than 70 years later because of offensiveness?
I think the "Why" is fair to ask.
I'd also had, no offense, a lot of flat-earth believers and sovereign citizens excitedly and giddily tell me about their secret knowledge. I think there's a very real human need to be "woke" to some truth. Knowing something others do not helps us elevate ourselves above them.
While I do think the holocaust is probably overstated, and a lot less died than is stated, because I am well aware of how the left twists and distorts statistics... I do think the gas chambers and crematoriums were completely real and in active use. I think the soil itself around these places is physical evidence, and there is geological evidence from the unnatural amount of burning people going on.
TLDR: The left lies, but they build their lying on some aspects of truth. I think that truth is more sinister than work camps.