The implication is , that too few people know that America engaged in massive book burning despite bitching about Germany doing that and despite claiming to be "for freedom of thought and press". Why is this part of history hidden?
In case people get confused on why the link leads to "item not found" the original link is supposed to include the dot at the end but for some reason when the link is posted here the dot is not included with the link. So when you click on the link be sure to add a dot at the end of the link
Why are you so salty? Im only bringing up the fact that the Allied powers went around condemning others for book burning whilst doing the same thing themselves. And also hiding that fact cause not many people know about that.
America put "freedom of thought and freedom of press" in to the Japanese constitution whilst at the same time burning over 7000 different books in Japan and using police force against people who rebelled against this book seizure. And all media after that had to have 2 copies of everything , sending a copy to the occupational forces to get "approval" and get censored according to what the occupational forces wanted. The hypocracy is hilarious.
Btw "freedom of press and freedom of thought" was put in the constitution for the benefit of commies, because imperial Japan used to jail communists. After the war, America freed the commies that Imperial Japan had jailed
Japanese are also descendents of Jomon who were definately there first.
And Ainu don't claim all of Japan , only the north of it in the Hokkaido area.
And commies don't "defend" anyone. They just use whatever group didn't build the country as a weapon against the group that did build the country.
Also Maori in New Zealand are considered "indigenous" to New Zealand despite only been in New Zealand for 7 hundred years whereas Japanese are not indigenous to Japan despite being in Japan for thousands of years?
Its clear the term "indigenous" is just used by globalist leftists to destroy any working civilization and means nothing.
What the fuck are you talking about? Plenty of anti jew people would say "just leave jews in their desert and stop dealing with them".The problem becomes when jews want to force themselves in to our societies and won't leave us alone. And there's plenty of people who are supporting Israel massacing muslims in the Middle east despite the fact that those muslims in the middle east have nothing to do with us. i haven't heard of anti muslim people saying "leave muslims alone in their desert" when they are cheerleading israel genociding the Palestinians with American tax payer's money
If that was the case than those artifacts would have been destroyed ages ago because the area was under muslim rule for thousands of years. But they weren't it was only when ISIS came along that it was destroyed. And its because they are controlled by CIA
It does have value though, it has value enough that powerful forces like the Allied powers wanted it destroyed. If you think something doesn't have value "just because it won't change your mind" then this whole forum doesn't have value because everyone already agrees that leftists are destroying society so what's the point of all the posts here telling us what we already know?
This reminds me, jews are also responsible for Prophet muhammud's assassination, and the death of Jesus Christ as well (the bible says this directly ) yet somehow, israel's gotten Christians and muslims to end up fighting each other instead. .