5
YesMovement 5 points ago +5 / -0

What's even more retarded is this guy has worked his whole life in PRO WRESTLING, an entire form of entertainment created so you could have sports but scripted out results so there wasn't blowouts etc.

He literally ran his own wrestling promotion, he'd never book a mega hyped up main event dream match to go this way.

This is your brain on TDS, kids.

2
YesMovement 2 points ago +2 / -0

Stories- not as elaborate as Iliad but family stories, etc.

3
YesMovement 3 points ago +3 / -0

Except as Matt Walsh pointed out, Back Dat Ass Up wasn't sing by your grandma to you- we listen to the original recording it's not passed down thru the generations.

8
YesMovement 8 points ago +8 / -0

Thinking men can be women, this same tribunal fined a school board member $750,000 for opposing trans sanity

19
YesMovement 19 points ago +19 / -0

They didn't have trannies and certainly wouldn't consider a mid negress to be the most beautiful woman alive.

They didn't have ghetto rappers either...

2
YesMovement 2 points ago +2 / -0

She actually doesn't even need the Notwithstanding Clause, not only does she have appeals but the ruling seems to be against only referendum separation questions. Like Quebec, she can call one herself.

8
YesMovement 8 points ago +8 / -0

Turns out the answer is benign and obvious- https://x.com/echipiuk/status/2054195608593031472

Shannon, no need to be a drama queen.

We were successful on two applications in our class actions, and these are Court-ordered costs.

Also, who turns off their comments while asking a question? Usually someone more interested in stirring up trouble than having an actual discussion. @SPhillipsAB

12
YesMovement 12 points ago +12 / -0

https://x.com/ikwilson/status/2054669878481781092

Justice Leonard’s decision does not block an Alberta independence referendum scheduled for Oct. 19. The decision only says Bill 14’s transition rules did not revive the citizen petition route.

A secession question should be initiated by Cabinet under the Referendum Act, with First Nations consulted before the vote in case Treaty/traditional rights are affected.

The lawful path now rests with the Smith government to set the independence question for October 2026 (just like the SCC envisioned in the court's 1998 Secession Reference case).

11
YesMovement 11 points ago +11 / -0

https://x.com/jonkay/status/2054371991839289827

Holy crap: CBC & Cdn Heritage both bankrolled that amateurish attempt to humiliate ppl who pointed out those 215 “unmarked graves” were never found. The bizarre thing is that on 4/17/2025, CBC itself admitted no graves were found. Did they also target CBC’s own public editor ?

10
YesMovement 10 points ago +10 / -0

https://x.com/NewWorldHominin/status/2054593748466880527

Here are some emails that I received from Molly Gore ("Pam Gibson") and Igor Vamos ("Michael Smith") as part of the "prank" show that CBC/APTN will be airing. This is how they were communicating with me

https://x.com/AaronGunn/status/2054354523762872348

I always thought the role of media was to hold the powerful accountable and to unapologetically seek the truth.

Apparently, the CBC views it as trying to deceive and trick individual citizens (and opposition Members of Parliament) into bizarre and intentional “traps”.

It’s something you would expect from a university fraternity, not a taxpayer-funded broadcaster.

I want answers. Why is the taxpayer-funded broadcaster contacting Canadians and a Member of Parliament in disguise and trying to trick us into participating in a twisted social experiment, in partnership with American leftists like Igor Vamos?

Will taxpayers also need to cover the legal bills for CBC in the inevitable lawsuits they are about to face?

I interviewed more than 300 Canadians for my documentaries (and didn't receive any taxpayer money).

Not once did I engage in garbage like this.

https://x.com/jonkay/status/2054542156312785319

Pranks can be fun (even if this one was a humiliating failure). what ppl are angry at is that this was done with govt cash, both from CBC & Cdn heritage dept. I.e. it wasn’t a subversive mischievous prank. It was a govt-approved propaganda gambit to attack ideological heretics

2
YesMovement 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rebel News has started doing this shit too, it's fucking awful.

13
YesMovement 13 points ago +13 / -0

Mark took now now "non binary" daughter to the disgraced Tavistock clinic, he's deep in the woke cult. Don't assume goodness.

4
YesMovement 4 points ago +4 / -0

The MUH RUSSIAN CONSPIRACY is even more retarded when it comes to this topic, since an independent Alberta would be able to export its oil to more foreign markets easier...displacing Russian oil which is their cash cow.

Russia has motivation to prevent Alberta leaving not helping it.

11
YesMovement 11 points ago +11 / -0

HAHA every screenshot on the Steam store page looks to be from a cutscene, as does both trailers.

1
YesMovement 1 point ago +1 / -0

The notwithstanding clause is the best thing about the Charter. Protects from activist judges.

Section 1 is what makes it meaningless because it says the rest can be ignored if you come up with a decent excuse.

1
YesMovement 1 point ago +1 / -0

So you don't know what you're talking about.

Dominos Pizza is good now too FYI.

4
YesMovement 4 points ago +4 / -0

Correct. 4 different judges on 2 different courts have all agreed on the same thing. The Appeals Court was 3 judges who made a unanimous decision, there was no split verdicts anywhere.

Only the Rouleau inquiry, where Trudeau literally appointed the judge, found anything different.

1
YesMovement 1 point ago +1 / -0

How long has it been since you've had their coffee? It used to be terrible but they made it way better.

Is it just Canada then, because here it's pretty good for the price.

1
YesMovement 1 point ago +1 / -0

We're literally trying to move our whole province out of the country it sucks so much.

1
YesMovement 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're arguing Canadians aren't liberal by default?

We have 3 major left wing parties in Canada but the capital L Liberals are considered the "natural ruling party" because they win more often than not. Despite having only 1 conservative party for most of our country's history (so no vote split) we struggle to win.

On top of the majors we have the small Green party which has managed to win 3 seats once.

1
YesMovement 1 point ago +1 / -0

Especially in more "redneck" areas like the south- Texas, etc. And they're all carrying guns too.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›