-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +1 / -7

My point was that women lie 90% of the time in general.

How many people have these demons pushed to suicide with false rape accusations now?

1
TheImpossible1 1 point ago +10 / -9

Your logo represents an entire culture of subhumans sexually harassing women, or the fact that your ceo allegedly pushed a woman to suicide.

Both of these have been confirmed to be lies by an internal investigation that was forced on them by California's gender "equality" courts.

As I said in another thread : Women and the truth go together like blue cheese and chocolate.

The world would be a better place if the darkness inside them precluded them from being listened to. Ever. Would you take advice from a goosestepping Neo-Nazi on how to treat Jews? Why would you take advice from women on how to treat men then?

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +2 / -7

The NFL guy accused of gang rape, was that one true? Depp and Heard? I shouldn't have to provide evidence they lie, that's self-evident. You need to provide evidence that they ever tell the truth.

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +3 / -6

this is as self-discrediting as it gets.

Haha. Right. Because women have never, ever shown desire to kill us for fun. There is no massive amount of books, movies and shows on that exact premise, written by women themselves.

No need to watch it, just like you didn't bother to read that book you were confidently talking about, just like you don't visit any country you claim to be expert about.

I don't speak Spanish. How on earth could I gather anything from watching her lie on tape?

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +3 / -6

You knew exactly what I meant. She was sitting there with an evil grin on her face, a dead body in front of her, rubbing herself in excitement (because they genuinely seem to derive sexual pleasure from killing) as she came up with the lie. There was no rape, she came up with it as part of her sick game.

I bet if you watch her "testimony", you'd see the trademark smirk of duper's delight.

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +3 / -6

I know all about women's lies regarding self-defense. You forget where I came from.

If the UK had jailed that woman for life, it would changed our trajectory forever. We didn't. We lost to them because of it.

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +3 / -6

She did invite him over, that's not disputed by anyone. You're really trying to defend a murderer, this is lower than when you shill for TERFs.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +6 / -11

How hard is it to kill someone who is stronger than you and fighting you, with a t-shirt? Her story is full of obvious lies like that. It's not fucking possible. It's something straight out of Hollywood feminist murder porn.

because they are not men

Because they are irrelevant to the safety of a normal person.

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +6 / -11

It's generally easier to make predictions when your side controls the narrative.

She didn't act in self defense. Her story is full of holes and improbable events that strongly suggest he was invited over specifically for her to murder him for fun.

I think she should be jailed for life to send a message to the rest of them about claiming "self defense" when you know you murdered in cold blood. It shows contempt for the victim, for the legal system and for humanity in general.

Then people wonder why Mexican men are trying to get over the border. South America is a feminist hellhole and even their right wing parties (maybe not Bolsonaro) are complicit. They think the US is better, but we're all in the same fucking boat that women shot to pieces out of pure spite.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +5 / -11

Because I don't need to, everyone sane knows that this story is suspicious. That's why feminist women protested to make her freedom happen, it's their new framework for killing us.

Take out the organized crime gangs who kill each other and mentally ill single-mother abuse victims and let's see if it still looks so favorable to the worse half of society.

-6
TheImpossible1 -6 points ago +5 / -11

Because they know it'll be overturned from public pressure.

I swear, you do not know anything about how feminists operate. The most important thing in that trial was to get a rape verdict on the board for her. Then they could move away from the evidence based court system that would likely jail her for murder and throw out her ridiculous rape story, towards public, violent protests in her name to force the government to back down.

Take a loss to get a win later on. It's why they are siding with the trads to get rid of their castration cult. Because they need to get rid of it before the true believers define women out of legal existence.

-3
TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +7 / -10

A court also agreed E Jean Carroll was sexually assaulted. Juries can be filled with women/their sympathizers.

-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +4 / -12

Probably while he was sleeping, then slipped his dick inside her after killing him to give the "evidence" that she was raped. Only way that works.

-8
TheImpossible1 -8 points ago +4 / -12

Did you read her "ordeal" or are you just being a simp?

This is women doing what they do best. Murdering someone and slandering their name to get away with it. See also : Coercive Control.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
-15
TheImpossible1 -15 points ago +4 / -19

The only way women would ever be completely happy is if the feminist goals were achieved and we didn't exist anymore.

Trying to make them happy is a fool's errand.

-9
TheImpossible1 -9 points ago +4 / -13

Not only did she murder a man in cold blood, she slandered his legacy and his good name to get away with it.

Scum.

-9
TheImpossible1 -9 points ago +3 / -12

Is this the lie of "mass female depression" being rolled back out again?

-5
TheImpossible1 -5 points ago +1 / -6

People acting despite the market is what's destroying nations. ESG would fail in a free market.

-13
TheImpossible1 -13 points ago +2 / -15

Oh ew.

-2
TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +6 / -8

Only ten times? Make it a hundred and I'd still argue it's too low.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›